I'm looking for a House Divided tag with the Atlanta Braves and Chicago Cubs on it! The only one's I can find are college football teams...anyone have any ideas???Does anyone know where to get "House Divided" Tags??
as of right now they dont manufacture themDoes anyone know where to get "House Divided" Tags??
I need on with 2 schools in different conferences. Purdue and Duke. Please let me know if you find a page that may have itDoes anyone know where to get "House Divided" Tags??
Follow the link below.
Saturday, March 10, 2012
How is representation in the House of Representation divided between the states?
please help!How is representation in the House of Representation divided between the states?
By population as determined by the most recent census.
By population as determined by the most recent census.
America is divided against itself, God told us a house divided cannot stand.?
What will become of our country in the near future if we do not come to an agreement?
Your thoughts on this.America is divided against itself, God told us a house divided cannot stand.?
Blessings.And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand". (From the Bible, Matthew 12:25.)......This is happening in America today, because she has left her first love, prayers out of School was America first down fall, to many separation of churches , with all the different beliefs is another main concern, lack of love for God and one another is another reason we are so divided. If we do not come together as one this great Nation will perish, we cannot prevail if we do not have love mercy and peace with each other, We as people of god, we need to humble our self , pray , repent, seek God face, and turn away from our wicked ways, God's says, if we do this, He will hear us from heaven and he will heal our land and forgive our sins., What a merciful god we have. America need God, and we all need to be save. We cannot do any thing with out the Lord in our life. God is our only help to bring this Nation back to her senses.
Depends on the kind of agreement made.
If America agrees to put God first, and votes for the God-fearing candidate who believes in freedom to own property and educating children from the Bible morals and manners, America will be blessed.
If they agree to worship man and the State, then we will most likely lose our freedom, lose our self-defense, even martyred just as those in china and North Korea are being done.America is divided against itself, God told us a house divided cannot stand.?
The United States of America is never explicitly mentioned in the Bible. In regard to the end times, the only nation the Bible seems to be concerned with, specifically, is Israel. Revelation does not mention any countries or nations, other than Israel (Revelation 7:4; 21:12). It mentions Babylon (Revelation 14:8; 16:19; 17:5; 18:2,10,21), but beyond that, it does not name specific places. Bible scholars debate whether this refers to a literal city of Babylon or whether Babylon is being used symbolically. Again, Israel is the focus of end-times Bible prophecy.
Why is the United States of America never mentioned in Bible prophecy? This could be for several reasons: (1) Perhaps the United States does not play an important role in the end times. (2) Perhaps the United States does not exist any more once the end times begin. (3) Perhaps the United States is included with all the other nations that reject God in the end times (Revelation 10:11; 11:18; 12:5; 14:8; 15:4; 16:19; 17:15; 18:3,23; 19:15). Option (3) is the most likely answer. The United States of America is the biggest supporter of Israel in the world today. This might not always be the case.
http://www.gotquestions.org/united-state鈥?/a>
Who knows what the future will bring, eventually it will have to be dealt with.
What I do know, is that no country can change the very foundation it was built on without conflict.
Americans will either find a way to peacefully deal with these divisions or they will have another revolution/rebellion.
Personally, I have faith in the American people.America is divided against itself, God told us a house divided cannot stand.?
We will become slaves to the enemy.
(Islam)
Hopefully GOD will intercede upon his children's behalf if we pray hard enough.
If they can't win by force then they will push their sheer numbers on a country to gain a upper hand of submission.
First off that wasn't God but Abraham Lincoln and that was in regard to the civil war.
Nothing will happen this is cyclical happens every 20-30 years!
We've been divided ever since there was a two party system...
america is the powerfullest country in the world no matter what they will still stand.
your country is a christian country,i feel the silent majority will pull you through.
Your thoughts on this.America is divided against itself, God told us a house divided cannot stand.?
Blessings.And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand". (From the Bible, Matthew 12:25.)......This is happening in America today, because she has left her first love, prayers out of School was America first down fall, to many separation of churches , with all the different beliefs is another main concern, lack of love for God and one another is another reason we are so divided. If we do not come together as one this great Nation will perish, we cannot prevail if we do not have love mercy and peace with each other, We as people of god, we need to humble our self , pray , repent, seek God face, and turn away from our wicked ways, God's says, if we do this, He will hear us from heaven and he will heal our land and forgive our sins., What a merciful god we have. America need God, and we all need to be save. We cannot do any thing with out the Lord in our life. God is our only help to bring this Nation back to her senses.
Depends on the kind of agreement made.
If America agrees to put God first, and votes for the God-fearing candidate who believes in freedom to own property and educating children from the Bible morals and manners, America will be blessed.
If they agree to worship man and the State, then we will most likely lose our freedom, lose our self-defense, even martyred just as those in china and North Korea are being done.America is divided against itself, God told us a house divided cannot stand.?
The United States of America is never explicitly mentioned in the Bible. In regard to the end times, the only nation the Bible seems to be concerned with, specifically, is Israel. Revelation does not mention any countries or nations, other than Israel (Revelation 7:4; 21:12). It mentions Babylon (Revelation 14:8; 16:19; 17:5; 18:2,10,21), but beyond that, it does not name specific places. Bible scholars debate whether this refers to a literal city of Babylon or whether Babylon is being used symbolically. Again, Israel is the focus of end-times Bible prophecy.
Why is the United States of America never mentioned in Bible prophecy? This could be for several reasons: (1) Perhaps the United States does not play an important role in the end times. (2) Perhaps the United States does not exist any more once the end times begin. (3) Perhaps the United States is included with all the other nations that reject God in the end times (Revelation 10:11; 11:18; 12:5; 14:8; 15:4; 16:19; 17:15; 18:3,23; 19:15). Option (3) is the most likely answer. The United States of America is the biggest supporter of Israel in the world today. This might not always be the case.
http://www.gotquestions.org/united-state鈥?/a>
Who knows what the future will bring, eventually it will have to be dealt with.
What I do know, is that no country can change the very foundation it was built on without conflict.
Americans will either find a way to peacefully deal with these divisions or they will have another revolution/rebellion.
Personally, I have faith in the American people.America is divided against itself, God told us a house divided cannot stand.?
We will become slaves to the enemy.
(Islam)
Hopefully GOD will intercede upon his children's behalf if we pray hard enough.
If they can't win by force then they will push their sheer numbers on a country to gain a upper hand of submission.
First off that wasn't God but Abraham Lincoln and that was in regard to the civil war.
Nothing will happen this is cyclical happens every 20-30 years!
We've been divided ever since there was a two party system...
america is the powerfullest country in the world no matter what they will still stand.
your country is a christian country,i feel the silent majority will pull you through.
Is the House MD episode, House Divided, on iTunes yet?
Could someone please check because my iTunes isn't working at the moment, thanks!Is the House MD episode, House Divided, on iTunes yet?
You can get the episode there, if you want: http://tvshows4download.com
You can get the episode there, if you want: http://tvshows4download.com
Do they make the House Divided license plates w/ baseball teams?? If so, where might I find them?
I am looking for one that has the Atlanta Braves and the St. Louis Cardinals on it. I saw one that actually had the plate divided and it said "He's a ________man, She's a __________fan" That's what I want the most.Do they make the House Divided license plates w/ baseball teams?? If so, where might I find them?
Yes, just go to your local DMV and they can point you in the right direction for ordering the specialized plates.civilization 4 iv medal of honor beta
Yes, just go to your local DMV and they can point you in the right direction for ordering the specialized plates.
Woodward Book Says Obama, Aides Deeply Divided Over Afghan War Strategy, it's said a house divided can't stand?
Has Barack lost control of his cabinet and is his administration falling apart? Three of his top advisers are leaving and the ones staying can't agree on their strategies for the future. Is this country in deep trouble with an inexperienced president? Hillary Clinton warned us that he was inexperienced and not the person to call in a crisis.Woodward Book Says Obama, Aides Deeply Divided Over Afghan War Strategy, it's said a house divided can't stand?
You hope.
There was uniformity in the Bush administration around the Iraq War--but they were uniformly wrong. Debate among advisers is healthy. All administrations have advisers who come and go.Woodward Book Says Obama, Aides Deeply Divided Over Afghan War Strategy, it's said a house divided can't stand?
Hillary is right on, and should be installed ahead of Joe, and Nancy, but that won't happen anytime soon. Obama should be made to go through about six months of 'paint-ball' combat in an urban warfare setting just to get a clue about what our men face daily!
What you say is true but I have a problem with your assumption that there is any "house" or semblance of an organization that can be divided in the first place.
If someone refers to an "administration", this usually connotes some kind of structure with objectives and a leader. The Obama white house is just a mishmash of ideologues, buddies, and semi-qualified "yes men" who loosely meander around this thing we refer to as the "Obama administration". Its funny to even use such a serious word as 'administration' when we refer to dufuss and his haphazard appointments.
So, I am saying that there was no real structure in the first place to be divided and Woodward merely confuses disorder with division. There has never been any order in the Obama white house.Woodward Book Says Obama, Aides Deeply Divided Over Afghan War Strategy, it's said a house divided can't stand?
Every single presidency has had disagreements like that especially when it pertains to war.
Did you sleep though the Bush years or something?
Every day, the Dems are becoming more and more divided. Obama is not only dividing his own party, but has divided the nation, yet he said during his campaign that he would bring the nation together. What a joke.
You hope.
There was uniformity in the Bush administration around the Iraq War--but they were uniformly wrong. Debate among advisers is healthy. All administrations have advisers who come and go.Woodward Book Says Obama, Aides Deeply Divided Over Afghan War Strategy, it's said a house divided can't stand?
Hillary is right on, and should be installed ahead of Joe, and Nancy, but that won't happen anytime soon. Obama should be made to go through about six months of 'paint-ball' combat in an urban warfare setting just to get a clue about what our men face daily!
What you say is true but I have a problem with your assumption that there is any "house" or semblance of an organization that can be divided in the first place.
If someone refers to an "administration", this usually connotes some kind of structure with objectives and a leader. The Obama white house is just a mishmash of ideologues, buddies, and semi-qualified "yes men" who loosely meander around this thing we refer to as the "Obama administration". Its funny to even use such a serious word as 'administration' when we refer to dufuss and his haphazard appointments.
So, I am saying that there was no real structure in the first place to be divided and Woodward merely confuses disorder with division. There has never been any order in the Obama white house.Woodward Book Says Obama, Aides Deeply Divided Over Afghan War Strategy, it's said a house divided can't stand?
Every single presidency has had disagreements like that especially when it pertains to war.
Did you sleep though the Bush years or something?
Every day, the Dems are becoming more and more divided. Obama is not only dividing his own party, but has divided the nation, yet he said during his campaign that he would bring the nation together. What a joke.
What is the meaning of a house divided against itself CAN NOT STAND!GBA?
Does love stand against itself,or does gate I mean hate stand against itself!?GBAWhat is the meaning of a house divided against itself CAN NOT STAND!GBA?
The saying, "A house divide against itself cannot stand" was said first by jesus in regard to calling his miracles "from the devil." He meant, if the devil is bettering the world, he is undermining himself.
Lincoln repeated it, in regard to the divided country, which he was determined to UNITE.
However, others simply wanted him to shut up and leave them alone.
In my opinion, this means that any group, whether it is a club, a family, a battalion, anything where there are people that have to work together to make the unit/group work -- even if members of the group have somewhat differing opinions on things, they have to stand together as a unit for the group to be able to perform its function.
For instance, if a battalion has to make an invasion or a siege, they have to work as a unit to take whatever stronghold they're trying to take. If a small group of the battalion didn't agree with the point of the commander and wanted to just "do their own thing" or sit on their bums and have a cup of tea, the entire unit could fall because of the division in ranks.
The word of "house" is in that statement, which is also good for looking at someone's own family life. For a family unit to work well (since no family is perfect) all of the members of that family have to have some common ground and stand together in the important things while still giving individual members the freedom that they may need at times. When all members of the family unit share some common ground, they will stand together as one when the bad times hit or when something tragic happens.
In regards to if love or hate stand against themselves. I've seen instances when love and hate, both, can actually unite a group -- ANY group. There are also instances when love will spawn hate, and hate will spawn love which will divide a group. Several members of a family may suddenly love a style of music to the point where other members of the family develop a hatred of the music so much that they will actually argue endlessly with those who love the music to the point where the family unit will become weakened. Philosophically, one could look at both sides here as having love, while both have hate at the same time. If the music loving side doesn't show respect for the music hating side and the two can't come to a feasible compromise, the entire minor situation can be blown into a huge weakening of that entire unit.
True, this music scenario is a very minor thing, but I think that you can see the point I'm trying to make. Sorry if it seems like I'm rambling a bit there. :)
Good question, by the way. Thank you for asking it.What is the meaning of a house divided against itself CAN NOT STAND!GBA?
Basically Jesus was saying that if Satan was the one responsible for casting out demons as the Pharisees suggested, then the house would not stand. Satan and his demons need to stay united. You could liken it to the 20,000+ Christian denominations of today, they are all divided on doctrine, so how will they stand?
Abraham Lincoln used this to discuss the need to end slavery..a free nation divided on freedom is not free...and the conflict that it caused to try to maintain is was destroying us anyway...sooo...
it was his decision then there there would be no firther compromise...
now admittedly we were already at war ..and the emancipation proclamation only freed people in the states that were not in insurrection ...but it was a a way of uniting thought and getting people behind what was arguably the most destructive time in American history
of course ehr borrowed ti from scripture - both from Joshua and Jesus - at some point goodness must be decided on and acted on - 50/50 doesn;t create goodness ..it just wears everyone down and eventually godd and bad fall togetherWhat is the meaning of a house divided against itself CAN NOT STAND!GBA?
Just say you can't understand simple english so maybe i should give you the Hebrew version or tell you with Nigerian Pidgin? Its simpler and easy to underSTAND!GBA?
It means that a house on stilts, when sawed in half, will cave inward. It should be rather obvious.
ITS IMPOSSIBLE IS THE EQUATION OF THE REPRESENTATION
Its just something that was written into a fictional book.. dont look to far into it.
it means if you cut your house in halves it will fall apart
The saying, "A house divide against itself cannot stand" was said first by jesus in regard to calling his miracles "from the devil." He meant, if the devil is bettering the world, he is undermining himself.
Lincoln repeated it, in regard to the divided country, which he was determined to UNITE.
However, others simply wanted him to shut up and leave them alone.
In my opinion, this means that any group, whether it is a club, a family, a battalion, anything where there are people that have to work together to make the unit/group work -- even if members of the group have somewhat differing opinions on things, they have to stand together as a unit for the group to be able to perform its function.
For instance, if a battalion has to make an invasion or a siege, they have to work as a unit to take whatever stronghold they're trying to take. If a small group of the battalion didn't agree with the point of the commander and wanted to just "do their own thing" or sit on their bums and have a cup of tea, the entire unit could fall because of the division in ranks.
The word of "house" is in that statement, which is also good for looking at someone's own family life. For a family unit to work well (since no family is perfect) all of the members of that family have to have some common ground and stand together in the important things while still giving individual members the freedom that they may need at times. When all members of the family unit share some common ground, they will stand together as one when the bad times hit or when something tragic happens.
In regards to if love or hate stand against themselves. I've seen instances when love and hate, both, can actually unite a group -- ANY group. There are also instances when love will spawn hate, and hate will spawn love which will divide a group. Several members of a family may suddenly love a style of music to the point where other members of the family develop a hatred of the music so much that they will actually argue endlessly with those who love the music to the point where the family unit will become weakened. Philosophically, one could look at both sides here as having love, while both have hate at the same time. If the music loving side doesn't show respect for the music hating side and the two can't come to a feasible compromise, the entire minor situation can be blown into a huge weakening of that entire unit.
True, this music scenario is a very minor thing, but I think that you can see the point I'm trying to make. Sorry if it seems like I'm rambling a bit there. :)
Good question, by the way. Thank you for asking it.What is the meaning of a house divided against itself CAN NOT STAND!GBA?
Basically Jesus was saying that if Satan was the one responsible for casting out demons as the Pharisees suggested, then the house would not stand. Satan and his demons need to stay united. You could liken it to the 20,000+ Christian denominations of today, they are all divided on doctrine, so how will they stand?
Abraham Lincoln used this to discuss the need to end slavery..a free nation divided on freedom is not free...and the conflict that it caused to try to maintain is was destroying us anyway...sooo...
it was his decision then there there would be no firther compromise...
now admittedly we were already at war ..and the emancipation proclamation only freed people in the states that were not in insurrection ...but it was a a way of uniting thought and getting people behind what was arguably the most destructive time in American history
of course ehr borrowed ti from scripture - both from Joshua and Jesus - at some point goodness must be decided on and acted on - 50/50 doesn;t create goodness ..it just wears everyone down and eventually godd and bad fall togetherWhat is the meaning of a house divided against itself CAN NOT STAND!GBA?
Just say you can't understand simple english so maybe i should give you the Hebrew version or tell you with Nigerian Pidgin? Its simpler and easy to underSTAND!GBA?
It means that a house on stilts, when sawed in half, will cave inward. It should be rather obvious.
ITS IMPOSSIBLE IS THE EQUATION OF THE REPRESENTATION
Its just something that was written into a fictional book.. dont look to far into it.
it means if you cut your house in halves it will fall apart
Me and my ex divorce 2years before the house sold and divided equally. She is working in other country in?
this 2 years she did not pay tax for Canada . Canada revenue agency lock my money and her. So. my point is that because of her my half part of the sold house locked for 2 years and I economically suffer a lot . recently I got my half part but not the whole amount . why I got less amount because of her not pay the tax in Canada. What is my option to get my rest of money that did-acted because of her taxation issue.Me and my ex divorce 2years before the house sold and divided equally. She is working in other country in?
My advice is to let your lawyer handle this.Me and my ex divorce 2years before the house sold and divided equally. She is working in other country in?
i'm not sure. maybe you should talk to ur lawyer...
good luck!Me and my ex divorce 2years before the house sold and divided equally. She is working in other country in?
You're probably going to have to sue her for the rest. Get an attorney and some English lessons.
My advice is to let your lawyer handle this.Me and my ex divorce 2years before the house sold and divided equally. She is working in other country in?
i'm not sure. maybe you should talk to ur lawyer...
good luck!Me and my ex divorce 2years before the house sold and divided equally. She is working in other country in?
You're probably going to have to sue her for the rest. Get an attorney and some English lessons.
"A house divided against itself cannot stand." How will the genders' mutual mistrust?
and inability to form healthy long term relationships affect the future of our society?
Do you care?"A house divided against itself cannot stand." How will the genders' mutual mistrust?
feminists seem to have created a cycle, you see they were upset because they felt women were being oppressed so they respond by giving women advantages and creating the very thing they set out to get rid of: that being oppression
we will achieve equality and trust when all problems are addressed and not just having the ones that effect women cherry picked from the pile
it will remain a proverbial tug of war match between the genders
"(Hetero)Sex lies a the heart of every Human Society and until we fully understand it, we can never understand Human Nature."
Heterosexual relationship is the most basic building block of society, once it collapses, society collapse itself. This is the DOMINO EFFECT at its simplest form.
Show me a society that can survive for long without a coherent heterosexual relationship, I can show you that it is only a primitive society of that of Chimpazee...Even a prehistoric society rely on this form of relationship to some extent.
A break down of gender relation will bring on Matriarchy, which history show, can never exist during tough time...except in some remote jungles .
This is also what Communism strive to achieve... to break down heterosexual relationship is the way to control the mass by just a few "elite" blood thirsty monsters called "Supreme Soviet central committee." (or some similar sh*t.
And Communism have collapsed spectacularly, while bringing down with it hundred of millions people. Its Crimes was much worse than Nazism.
Yes, a house divided against itself cannot stand. In the end, feminism only contribution to civilization...is to destroy the very foundation (civilization) that it stands on."A house divided against itself cannot stand." How will the genders' mutual mistrust?
How relationships work are up to individuals... I've been divorced for a few years, and I get along fine with him. We are raising our children together, and we see them pretty equally.
We had a hard time [at first] because the kids tried to get away with certain things, by telling me one thing, then telling him something completely different, but we put a nix to that pretty quick.
In fact, I just got off the phone with him a little while ago, just to see how his trip went.
The key is, that I don't base all men, on what happened between me and my ex.
Society is slowly devolving. Modern Governments spend more money and resources on social programs for dysfunctional people than at any other time in history. What families use to manage on their own has been replaced by the government."A house divided against itself cannot stand." How will the genders' mutual mistrust?
I wonder who the people who believe the sexes are in harmony are? I'm sure feminists are happy with the way things are now.. yet that still hasn't stopped them from complaining.
Observe what's happening in the US and you will know the answer - dysfunctional.
I suggest you get some fresh air if you believe a wide gulf exist between the sexes. Yes, there are radicals on both sides but the vast majority of people are in the middle looking for balance and harmony.
Do you care?"A house divided against itself cannot stand." How will the genders' mutual mistrust?
feminists seem to have created a cycle, you see they were upset because they felt women were being oppressed so they respond by giving women advantages and creating the very thing they set out to get rid of: that being oppression
we will achieve equality and trust when all problems are addressed and not just having the ones that effect women cherry picked from the pile
it will remain a proverbial tug of war match between the genders
"(Hetero)Sex lies a the heart of every Human Society and until we fully understand it, we can never understand Human Nature."
Heterosexual relationship is the most basic building block of society, once it collapses, society collapse itself. This is the DOMINO EFFECT at its simplest form.
Show me a society that can survive for long without a coherent heterosexual relationship, I can show you that it is only a primitive society of that of Chimpazee...Even a prehistoric society rely on this form of relationship to some extent.
A break down of gender relation will bring on Matriarchy, which history show, can never exist during tough time...except in some remote jungles .
This is also what Communism strive to achieve... to break down heterosexual relationship is the way to control the mass by just a few "elite" blood thirsty monsters called "Supreme Soviet central committee." (or some similar sh*t.
And Communism have collapsed spectacularly, while bringing down with it hundred of millions people. Its Crimes was much worse than Nazism.
Yes, a house divided against itself cannot stand. In the end, feminism only contribution to civilization...is to destroy the very foundation (civilization) that it stands on."A house divided against itself cannot stand." How will the genders' mutual mistrust?
How relationships work are up to individuals... I've been divorced for a few years, and I get along fine with him. We are raising our children together, and we see them pretty equally.
We had a hard time [at first] because the kids tried to get away with certain things, by telling me one thing, then telling him something completely different, but we put a nix to that pretty quick.
In fact, I just got off the phone with him a little while ago, just to see how his trip went.
The key is, that I don't base all men, on what happened between me and my ex.
Society is slowly devolving. Modern Governments spend more money and resources on social programs for dysfunctional people than at any other time in history. What families use to manage on their own has been replaced by the government."A house divided against itself cannot stand." How will the genders' mutual mistrust?
I wonder who the people who believe the sexes are in harmony are? I'm sure feminists are happy with the way things are now.. yet that still hasn't stopped them from complaining.
Observe what's happening in the US and you will know the answer - dysfunctional.
I suggest you get some fresh air if you believe a wide gulf exist between the sexes. Yes, there are radicals on both sides but the vast majority of people are in the middle looking for balance and harmony.
It is said a house divided cannot stand. After Jesus left they all were murdered and divided... so then?
How does that stand, since they divided between each other and many killed but one, who supposedly stood?It is said a house divided cannot stand. After Jesus left they all were murdered and divided... so then?
They never divided on their belief in Jesus Christ that he was the promised Messiah.
The Christians never killed anyone. The religious nuts did in fact persecute and kill those who didn't share their insane view of the Bible.It is said a house divided cannot stand. After Jesus left they all were murdered and divided... so then?
I like cheese?It is said a house divided cannot stand. After Jesus left they all were murdered and divided... so then?
the church jesus founded still stands, the dissidents who left and started their own have built their churches on sand ,which some are starting to crumble,
jesus's church is built on a rockbray and scarff surrogate mothers
They never divided on their belief in Jesus Christ that he was the promised Messiah.
The Christians never killed anyone. The religious nuts did in fact persecute and kill those who didn't share their insane view of the Bible.It is said a house divided cannot stand. After Jesus left they all were murdered and divided... so then?
I like cheese?It is said a house divided cannot stand. After Jesus left they all were murdered and divided... so then?
the church jesus founded still stands, the dissidents who left and started their own have built their churches on sand ,which some are starting to crumble,
jesus's church is built on a rock
When the House of God is divided what happens? What divides the house?
What is a stumbling block?
What is a stone that can be used for the Glory of God, called?
Oh and when the thief enters, do you ask for Credentials,
before you let him pull you over?
Or do you just fall for it all?When the House of God is divided what happens? What divides the house?
Negative energy only breeds more of the same.
A stumbling block is a boulder in the road. We can choose to walk around it. :D
Christ is my 'Rock!
1 Corinthians 10:4
And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.
Where your treasures are there will your heart be also. The things of this life are temporal but the things of God last forever
Matthew 6:19
Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon the earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal.
They can have it all! I will walk away and still be wealthier than the richest man in the world! :D
Matthew 5: 39-48
Take my life too!
Matthew 10:28
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul:
I 'fall' for nothing but, for God himself. Otherwise, I do not waiver - not one little bit! :D
Peace and Blessings
(((SDWL)))When the House of God is divided what happens? What divides the house?
When the house of God is divided, it loses focus and starts to sink as Peter did when he was invited out on the water with Jesus. Jealousy, fear and all those things of the devil can divide a congregation. Forces like hate, jealousy, fear, confusion and lies are examples of stumbling blocks. A stone that can be used for the glory of God isn't physical, but a principality. The thief enters by bringing hate, fear, jealousy, etc. You cannot see the thief nor ask for credentials because the devil's a force, not a person.When the House of God is divided what happens? What divides the house?
When the house of God is divided, we are indeed divided, and so we're really just messing with the real message, like the Mormons, and the Jehovah's witnesses. They think they're doing Gods work, but they're way off.
Two words: Conflict. Self-Interest.
In that order.
What is a stone that can be used for the Glory of God, called?
Oh and when the thief enters, do you ask for Credentials,
before you let him pull you over?
Or do you just fall for it all?When the House of God is divided what happens? What divides the house?
Negative energy only breeds more of the same.
A stumbling block is a boulder in the road. We can choose to walk around it. :D
Christ is my 'Rock!
1 Corinthians 10:4
And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.
Where your treasures are there will your heart be also. The things of this life are temporal but the things of God last forever
Matthew 6:19
Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon the earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal.
They can have it all! I will walk away and still be wealthier than the richest man in the world! :D
Matthew 5: 39-48
Take my life too!
Matthew 10:28
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul:
I 'fall' for nothing but, for God himself. Otherwise, I do not waiver - not one little bit! :D
Peace and Blessings
(((SDWL)))When the House of God is divided what happens? What divides the house?
When the house of God is divided, it loses focus and starts to sink as Peter did when he was invited out on the water with Jesus. Jealousy, fear and all those things of the devil can divide a congregation. Forces like hate, jealousy, fear, confusion and lies are examples of stumbling blocks. A stone that can be used for the glory of God isn't physical, but a principality. The thief enters by bringing hate, fear, jealousy, etc. You cannot see the thief nor ask for credentials because the devil's a force, not a person.When the House of God is divided what happens? What divides the house?
When the house of God is divided, we are indeed divided, and so we're really just messing with the real message, like the Mormons, and the Jehovah's witnesses. They think they're doing Gods work, but they're way off.
Two words: Conflict. Self-Interest.
In that order.
Is it true that the Bush White House was divided between Cheney/Rumsfeld and Powell/Rice?
I watched the Oliver Stone movie "W." and it seems as if Cheney and Rumsfeld were always more war-hawkish whereas Powell and Rice wanted Bush to try more more diplomatic approaches, and Bush decided to listen to Cheney and Rumsfeld.
Is this true?Is it true that the Bush White House was divided between Cheney/Rumsfeld and Powell/Rice?
yes, that's why they got away from W as soon as they could.Is it true that the Bush White House was divided between Cheney/Rumsfeld and Powell/Rice?
You are correct. However, Cheney/Rumsfeld were sidelined during Bush's 2nd term in favor of Powell/Rice. Of course, Rumsfeld "quit" (was fired) after the "thumping" the GOP received in the 2006 elections. Powell was not a part of Bush's second term.Is it true that the Bush White House was divided between Cheney/Rumsfeld and Powell/Rice?
Rumsfeld put Bible Quotes on the President's daily war briefings.
How could Powell possibly compete with that?
Is this true?Is it true that the Bush White House was divided between Cheney/Rumsfeld and Powell/Rice?
yes, that's why they got away from W as soon as they could.Is it true that the Bush White House was divided between Cheney/Rumsfeld and Powell/Rice?
You are correct. However, Cheney/Rumsfeld were sidelined during Bush's 2nd term in favor of Powell/Rice. Of course, Rumsfeld "quit" (was fired) after the "thumping" the GOP received in the 2006 elections. Powell was not a part of Bush's second term.Is it true that the Bush White House was divided between Cheney/Rumsfeld and Powell/Rice?
Rumsfeld put Bible Quotes on the President's daily war briefings.
How could Powell possibly compete with that?
Are five books of Moses allegorically "five in one house divided", thereby such law vs law hse falls to ruin?
Luke 15:32 (five in one house divided)
Mt 12:55; Mk 3:25; Lk 11:17 (hse divided falls)Are five books of Moses allegorically "five in one house divided", thereby such law vs law hse falls to ruin?
** A house divided falls to ruin where a plagiarist will usurp the rights of one or both and exploit the rift and animosity. If one is respectable and the other wise a family of separated spouses and two homes will survive and prosper but there is invariably attached a deception, unusually the cause of the battling or estrangement.
The house falls to ruin if one party use the offspring as missives against one another rather than both conjoin efforts to ensure both have their liberty and joy from the fulfilling of their duty to the dependants and full lives.
If these obligations are fulfilled and any invasive or intrusive third party having created and exploiting the rift of a once strong and respected house then the sinful party requires removal at the behest and acquiescence of both spouses.
In this instance other external factors at play and in control have orchestrated the situation to shift onus of blame and ensure the right remains entrenched to utilise one and oppress one spouse. Something they could not ethically do with any degree of legality or morals without consent of the establishment and powers at large and all concerned parties...
The rift between the spouses was caused by a powerful external force who ensure by all deceptive and scurrulious means to ensure one it remains. There is no need for such necessity for others to profit, it is as usual merely an affront and to shame those devouring and pillaging the rights and good fortune of another...
Where two nations, religions, parties, spouses wage war a third party invariably always profits and deters any reconciliation for this reason ...**Are five books of Moses allegorically "five in one house divided", thereby such law vs law hse falls to ruin?
The law of Moses was the schoolmaster to the coming of Christ.
Genesis was done year 2368, Gen.50:24,25 [ when Joseph died ]. Jacob is age 130, Gen.47:9, 215 years after Abraham's covenant to be in Rameses Egypt with 70 in family [ the 12 tribes of Israel ]. Joseph dies in 70 years.
Abraham's father was born 222 years after Noah and year 1656 [ The earth, Gen.6:13, and earthwide violence has just been destroyed, life gets shorter ], Abraham's father died age 205, Gen.11:32, 427 years after year 1656, and Abraham was age 75, Gen.12:4, at Covenant [ he is surrounded by land grabbing land pirates ], He was age 137 and Isaac age 37 [ age 40 to wed Rebecca ], when Sarah died, Gen.23:1; he has 6 sons by Keturah, he dies age 175 at death, Gen.25:1-7,9; Ishmael is age 89 [ of 137, Gen.25:17 ]; Isaac is age 75 [ of 180, Gen. 35: 28,29 ], Jacob is age 15 [ of 147, Gen. 47: 28 ], so at age 130, 215 years after covenant he is in Rameses Egypt, Moses is age 80, 215 years later, Exo.7:7, 12:37,40,41, at 430 years after covenant, 857 years after year 1656. [ Gal.3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 3:17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 3:18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
Gal.3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 3:25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
Moses dies in 40th year, covenant heirs have the law, 897 years after year 1656. Leviticus is law for priestline, 1Chr.6:1-15; Moses law is schoolmaster to Christ.
Moses compiled Genesis done 712 years at 857 to 897 years after year 1656. Moses compiled Job done 777 years [ same time as Genesis ], after year 1656.
Moses wrote, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy [ Heirs still surrounded by the last 470 years of trespassing land grabbing land pirates to be wiped out, as all this time thay have made no place for Abraham's kin ].
Luke 16:16,17; The law and the prophets were unto John [ the Baptist ], since that time the kingdom of God is preached and every man presseth into it, the word is forever.
At 857 years after year 1656, Moses compiles 2 books, writes 4 books.
At year 2513, O.T. 39 books, 1110 years, many write, done 443 BCE.
Greece 336 BCE.Are five books of Moses allegorically "five in one house divided", thereby such law vs law hse falls to ruin?
Do you know the Moses story?
Moses identifies himself as the meekest man on the Earth... He wrote so about himself in the first 5 books of the Bible! So he must know what he was writing! Most Christians with a very low IQ don’t have the foggiest idea of what we are talking about!
Numbers 12:3 Now the man Moses was very meek, above all the men which were upon the face of the earth.
The first thing that we know of this Holy and meek “LAW GIVER” in the Bible is that he stabbed in the back an Egyptian foreman because he was rough on the Hebrews! Moses became a fugitive of the Egyptian law for 40 years. He sought refuge in the kingdom of Midian(?). You can call it the Kingdom of Oz for that matter. If Moses ever had to kill anybody without mercy including innocent babies he did it because God (NOT SATAN) made him do it! So when he came up with “Thou shalt not kill” commandment it was more like a big finger salute to the Egyptian foreman that he murdered with God’s blessings! The Bible God ordered Moses to slaughter everybody in the Palestinian region, too to make room for Israel! Praise the LORD!
Numbers 25:16-17 (NIV) The Lord said to Moses, “Treat the Midianites as enemies and kill them* (*Zipporah, Moses’ first long term loving wife was a Midianite. God is providing a way for Moses to get rid of a wife! Or am I wrong? Actually the Bible God has people slaughtered just for the heck of it, too!)
Numbers 31:17-18 (NIV) Now kill all the boys* (*Moses loving children were Midianite citizens born in Midian!). And kill every woman* (*including Moses mother in law and any other female relative!) who has slept with a man, BUT SAVE FOR YOURSELVES EVERY GIRL WHO HAS NEVER SLEPT WITH A MAN.
Isn’t this Bible God so sweet to the holy predators? And who says that God promoted pedophilia and the killing of innocent children is a sin!? In Midian alone the glorious ARMY OF JEHOVAH THE LORD OF HOSTS OF ISRAEL collected 32,000 little innocent virgin girls for their own pleasure! PRAISE THE LORD! Sweet Jesus! Amen? (Num. 31:35)
MOSES IS THE ENVY OF ANY SEXUAL PREDATOR IN THE WORLD TODAY!... After this episode in the Bible stories that hardly any Christian reads it became a routine in Israel to kill everybody even when fighting among each other, but to always spare the YOUNG VIRGIN GIRLS as war trophies for the pleasure of the obedient soldiers of the glorious ARMY OF JEHOVAH GOD…! A team of avid Levite Priests was always at hand to use their big fat fingers in the inspection of all the little girls to see if they still had their hymen intact. Like in Christian America around election time nicked and butterfly hymens don’t count and the girl was slaughtered on the spot! Praise The LORD! Sweet Jesus! Isn’t that what PURITY BALLS are all about? Any of those girls could have been your own daughter, but what the heck! Even God the Holy Ghost abused the Blessed Virgin Mary with total immunity! Hardly any Christian pay attention to what they read in the Bible… to the great relief of the Clergy!
Judges 21:10-11 (NIV) So the assembly* (*Israelite leaders) sent twelve thousand fighting men with instructions to go to Jabesh Gilead AND PUT TO THE SWORD THOSE LIVING THERE* (*they were God’s chosen people of Israel too, but they disobeyed God!), INCLUDING THE WOMEN AND CHILDREN. “This is what you are to do,” they said. “kill every male AND EVERY WOMAN WHO IS NOT A VIRGIN.”
The glorious ARMY OF JEHOVAH GOD killed all the Israelites (their own people) residents in the town of Jabesh Gilead, except for 400 young virgin girls (Judges 21:12) that they rounded up so the male Israelites from the tribe of Benjamin could replace the wives that were slaughtered earlier by the same ARMY OF GOD. The Priests of GOD were there to make a full check of the little girls’ tight vagina to certify that each one of the young girls was still virgin... (Come on… it won’t hurt you! They probably said before poking their big fat fingers to find out!) Most likely some of the girls had to be checked more than once, just to make sure otherwise they were slaughtered! Today, some discreet preachers can only fantasize about God’s provisions for his chosen people…!!!
BTW... Moses’ first wife was a Midianite... His Father in Law Jethro was a Heathen priest in Midian who was very helpful to Moses to take Israel out of Egypt! The Midianites gave Moses not only a loving and faithful wife, but food and shelter. Moses lived 40 years with them and raised a family with at least 2 kids that we know their names and he made a lot of friends, too, but at the Exodus time God decides to KILL EVERYBODY IN MIDIAN including Moses’ wife’s family except ONLY for the young virgin girls that were spared for the exclusive pleasure of God’s chosen sexual predators… oops… sorry… CHOSEN PEOPLE...! AND MOSES DOESN’T OBJECT OR QUESTIONS GOD AT ALL like he does in so many other cases on trivial issues, but in full cold blood Moses orders the killings to proceed as planned! In fact, he was very upset that his orders were not carried out immediately! Whoever wrote these stories in the Bible were about the most vicious wanking perverts concocting their primitive idea of a God that is unlike anything ever published in any smut magazine today! Christians swallow all these stories as their daily bread and want to make sure all our kids in public schools read the Bible! Every single Bible college educated “spiritual leader” is fully aware of what he/she needs to discard of the Bible to make a living out of Christian gullibility!
MOSES IS HIGHLY HONORED FOR BETRAYING and slaughtering his Midianite friends and relatives, but then God gets mad at Moses because he struck a piece of rock twice instead of once as God ambiguously ordered so God wouldn’t let him set foot on the PROMISED LAND!
What would be a more serious offense to an “all wise” God, the destruction in total human rage of the HOLY tablets of the 10 commandments written by the very FINGER OF GOD that nobody ever saw except Moses, or the innocent striking with a stick for the second time on a piece of rock? You need to be totally void of moral values to even read all these obscene stories in the Bible! That’s probably why most Christians buy the Bible but hardly read it! Can you imagine a revised X rated EXODUS movie telling the whole Bible story on the Exodus as it is really written in the Bible? Christians still love the Bible God the same way the Nazis loved Hitler…! I know it is hard to explain, but true!! History repeats itself and I wouldn’t be surprised if the Christians that are so brainwashed now with Jesus puking lukewarm Christians will eventually drop the Bible with all its fairy tales the same way the Germans dropped Hitler.
Mt 12:55; Mk 3:25; Lk 11:17 (hse divided falls)Are five books of Moses allegorically "five in one house divided", thereby such law vs law hse falls to ruin?
** A house divided falls to ruin where a plagiarist will usurp the rights of one or both and exploit the rift and animosity. If one is respectable and the other wise a family of separated spouses and two homes will survive and prosper but there is invariably attached a deception, unusually the cause of the battling or estrangement.
The house falls to ruin if one party use the offspring as missives against one another rather than both conjoin efforts to ensure both have their liberty and joy from the fulfilling of their duty to the dependants and full lives.
If these obligations are fulfilled and any invasive or intrusive third party having created and exploiting the rift of a once strong and respected house then the sinful party requires removal at the behest and acquiescence of both spouses.
In this instance other external factors at play and in control have orchestrated the situation to shift onus of blame and ensure the right remains entrenched to utilise one and oppress one spouse. Something they could not ethically do with any degree of legality or morals without consent of the establishment and powers at large and all concerned parties...
The rift between the spouses was caused by a powerful external force who ensure by all deceptive and scurrulious means to ensure one it remains. There is no need for such necessity for others to profit, it is as usual merely an affront and to shame those devouring and pillaging the rights and good fortune of another...
Where two nations, religions, parties, spouses wage war a third party invariably always profits and deters any reconciliation for this reason ...**Are five books of Moses allegorically "five in one house divided", thereby such law vs law hse falls to ruin?
The law of Moses was the schoolmaster to the coming of Christ.
Genesis was done year 2368, Gen.50:24,25 [ when Joseph died ]. Jacob is age 130, Gen.47:9, 215 years after Abraham's covenant to be in Rameses Egypt with 70 in family [ the 12 tribes of Israel ]. Joseph dies in 70 years.
Abraham's father was born 222 years after Noah and year 1656 [ The earth, Gen.6:13, and earthwide violence has just been destroyed, life gets shorter ], Abraham's father died age 205, Gen.11:32, 427 years after year 1656, and Abraham was age 75, Gen.12:4, at Covenant [ he is surrounded by land grabbing land pirates ], He was age 137 and Isaac age 37 [ age 40 to wed Rebecca ], when Sarah died, Gen.23:1; he has 6 sons by Keturah, he dies age 175 at death, Gen.25:1-7,9; Ishmael is age 89 [ of 137, Gen.25:17 ]; Isaac is age 75 [ of 180, Gen. 35: 28,29 ], Jacob is age 15 [ of 147, Gen. 47: 28 ], so at age 130, 215 years after covenant he is in Rameses Egypt, Moses is age 80, 215 years later, Exo.7:7, 12:37,40,41, at 430 years after covenant, 857 years after year 1656. [ Gal.3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 3:17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. 3:18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
Gal.3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 3:25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
Moses dies in 40th year, covenant heirs have the law, 897 years after year 1656. Leviticus is law for priestline, 1Chr.6:1-15; Moses law is schoolmaster to Christ.
Moses compiled Genesis done 712 years at 857 to 897 years after year 1656. Moses compiled Job done 777 years [ same time as Genesis ], after year 1656.
Moses wrote, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy [ Heirs still surrounded by the last 470 years of trespassing land grabbing land pirates to be wiped out, as all this time thay have made no place for Abraham's kin ].
Luke 16:16,17; The law and the prophets were unto John [ the Baptist ], since that time the kingdom of God is preached and every man presseth into it, the word is forever.
At 857 years after year 1656, Moses compiles 2 books, writes 4 books.
At year 2513, O.T. 39 books, 1110 years, many write, done 443 BCE.
Greece 336 BCE.Are five books of Moses allegorically "five in one house divided", thereby such law vs law hse falls to ruin?
Do you know the Moses story?
Moses identifies himself as the meekest man on the Earth... He wrote so about himself in the first 5 books of the Bible! So he must know what he was writing! Most Christians with a very low IQ don’t have the foggiest idea of what we are talking about!
Numbers 12:3 Now the man Moses was very meek, above all the men which were upon the face of the earth.
The first thing that we know of this Holy and meek “LAW GIVER” in the Bible is that he stabbed in the back an Egyptian foreman because he was rough on the Hebrews! Moses became a fugitive of the Egyptian law for 40 years. He sought refuge in the kingdom of Midian(?). You can call it the Kingdom of Oz for that matter. If Moses ever had to kill anybody without mercy including innocent babies he did it because God (NOT SATAN) made him do it! So when he came up with “Thou shalt not kill” commandment it was more like a big finger salute to the Egyptian foreman that he murdered with God’s blessings! The Bible God ordered Moses to slaughter everybody in the Palestinian region, too to make room for Israel! Praise the LORD!
Numbers 25:16-17 (NIV) The Lord said to Moses, “Treat the Midianites as enemies and kill them* (*Zipporah, Moses’ first long term loving wife was a Midianite. God is providing a way for Moses to get rid of a wife! Or am I wrong? Actually the Bible God has people slaughtered just for the heck of it, too!)
Numbers 31:17-18 (NIV) Now kill all the boys* (*Moses loving children were Midianite citizens born in Midian!). And kill every woman* (*including Moses mother in law and any other female relative!) who has slept with a man, BUT SAVE FOR YOURSELVES EVERY GIRL WHO HAS NEVER SLEPT WITH A MAN.
Isn’t this Bible God so sweet to the holy predators? And who says that God promoted pedophilia and the killing of innocent children is a sin!? In Midian alone the glorious ARMY OF JEHOVAH THE LORD OF HOSTS OF ISRAEL collected 32,000 little innocent virgin girls for their own pleasure! PRAISE THE LORD! Sweet Jesus! Amen? (Num. 31:35)
MOSES IS THE ENVY OF ANY SEXUAL PREDATOR IN THE WORLD TODAY!... After this episode in the Bible stories that hardly any Christian reads it became a routine in Israel to kill everybody even when fighting among each other, but to always spare the YOUNG VIRGIN GIRLS as war trophies for the pleasure of the obedient soldiers of the glorious ARMY OF JEHOVAH GOD…! A team of avid Levite Priests was always at hand to use their big fat fingers in the inspection of all the little girls to see if they still had their hymen intact. Like in Christian America around election time nicked and butterfly hymens don’t count and the girl was slaughtered on the spot! Praise The LORD! Sweet Jesus! Isn’t that what PURITY BALLS are all about? Any of those girls could have been your own daughter, but what the heck! Even God the Holy Ghost abused the Blessed Virgin Mary with total immunity! Hardly any Christian pay attention to what they read in the Bible… to the great relief of the Clergy!
Judges 21:10-11 (NIV) So the assembly* (*Israelite leaders) sent twelve thousand fighting men with instructions to go to Jabesh Gilead AND PUT TO THE SWORD THOSE LIVING THERE* (*they were God’s chosen people of Israel too, but they disobeyed God!), INCLUDING THE WOMEN AND CHILDREN. “This is what you are to do,” they said. “kill every male AND EVERY WOMAN WHO IS NOT A VIRGIN.”
The glorious ARMY OF JEHOVAH GOD killed all the Israelites (their own people) residents in the town of Jabesh Gilead, except for 400 young virgin girls (Judges 21:12) that they rounded up so the male Israelites from the tribe of Benjamin could replace the wives that were slaughtered earlier by the same ARMY OF GOD. The Priests of GOD were there to make a full check of the little girls’ tight vagina to certify that each one of the young girls was still virgin... (Come on… it won’t hurt you! They probably said before poking their big fat fingers to find out!) Most likely some of the girls had to be checked more than once, just to make sure otherwise they were slaughtered! Today, some discreet preachers can only fantasize about God’s provisions for his chosen people…!!!
BTW... Moses’ first wife was a Midianite... His Father in Law Jethro was a Heathen priest in Midian who was very helpful to Moses to take Israel out of Egypt! The Midianites gave Moses not only a loving and faithful wife, but food and shelter. Moses lived 40 years with them and raised a family with at least 2 kids that we know their names and he made a lot of friends, too, but at the Exodus time God decides to KILL EVERYBODY IN MIDIAN including Moses’ wife’s family except ONLY for the young virgin girls that were spared for the exclusive pleasure of God’s chosen sexual predators… oops… sorry… CHOSEN PEOPLE...! AND MOSES DOESN’T OBJECT OR QUESTIONS GOD AT ALL like he does in so many other cases on trivial issues, but in full cold blood Moses orders the killings to proceed as planned! In fact, he was very upset that his orders were not carried out immediately! Whoever wrote these stories in the Bible were about the most vicious wanking perverts concocting their primitive idea of a God that is unlike anything ever published in any smut magazine today! Christians swallow all these stories as their daily bread and want to make sure all our kids in public schools read the Bible! Every single Bible college educated “spiritual leader” is fully aware of what he/she needs to discard of the Bible to make a living out of Christian gullibility!
MOSES IS HIGHLY HONORED FOR BETRAYING and slaughtering his Midianite friends and relatives, but then God gets mad at Moses because he struck a piece of rock twice instead of once as God ambiguously ordered so God wouldn’t let him set foot on the PROMISED LAND!
What would be a more serious offense to an “all wise” God, the destruction in total human rage of the HOLY tablets of the 10 commandments written by the very FINGER OF GOD that nobody ever saw except Moses, or the innocent striking with a stick for the second time on a piece of rock? You need to be totally void of moral values to even read all these obscene stories in the Bible! That’s probably why most Christians buy the Bible but hardly read it! Can you imagine a revised X rated EXODUS movie telling the whole Bible story on the Exodus as it is really written in the Bible? Christians still love the Bible God the same way the Nazis loved Hitler…! I know it is hard to explain, but true!! History repeats itself and I wouldn’t be surprised if the Christians that are so brainwashed now with Jesus puking lukewarm Christians will eventually drop the Bible with all its fairy tales the same way the Germans dropped Hitler.
Estate is to be sold and divided between siblings.can a sibling remain in the house untill the house is sold ?
Mother passes away a will is left for the house to be sold and divided between siblings.Can a sibling remain in the house untill the house is sold.Estate is to be sold and divided between siblings.can a sibling remain in the house untill the house is sold ?
That is up to the siblings to decide.
Sometimes people don't realize that the civil legal system only exists when people have completely failed to agree on thier own.
Anything can be done in this situation, but you need to get agreement from the people who have a stake in it. If nobody objects to someone living in the house until it is sold then you have no problem, if there is disagreeement you need to work it out. If it is such a big intractable problem you can't work it out and you have completely failed, and the only way to come to an agreement is an expensive involvement of the courts, then get out your check book and go to court about it. It will cost you.Estate is to be sold and divided between siblings.can a sibling remain in the house untill the house is sold ?
It depends on the other siblings. Well, its a family matter agreement, nonetheless, someone is allowed to stay in the house while its not yet sold. Once sold of course they have to move out from their.
only if the other siblings agree to itEstate is to be sold and divided between siblings.can a sibling remain in the house untill the house is sold ?
As long as the other siblings agree, yes.
That is up to the siblings to decide.
Sometimes people don't realize that the civil legal system only exists when people have completely failed to agree on thier own.
Anything can be done in this situation, but you need to get agreement from the people who have a stake in it. If nobody objects to someone living in the house until it is sold then you have no problem, if there is disagreeement you need to work it out. If it is such a big intractable problem you can't work it out and you have completely failed, and the only way to come to an agreement is an expensive involvement of the courts, then get out your check book and go to court about it. It will cost you.Estate is to be sold and divided between siblings.can a sibling remain in the house untill the house is sold ?
It depends on the other siblings. Well, its a family matter agreement, nonetheless, someone is allowed to stay in the house while its not yet sold. Once sold of course they have to move out from their.
only if the other siblings agree to itEstate is to be sold and divided between siblings.can a sibling remain in the house untill the house is sold ?
As long as the other siblings agree, yes.
Who said a house divided will not stand?
I think it is abe lonclonWho said a house divided will not stand?
Yes, Abraham Lincoln.
Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, "Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand.Who said a house divided will not stand?
The quote is first attributed to Jesus of Nazareth and later to Abraham Lincoln. I have no idea who the hell abe lonclon is/was.
It was Abraham Lincoln. He was talking about how the United States will not be able to stand together if they each have opposing views; this is one of his more famous quotes.Who said a house divided will not stand?
No. It's from the book of matthew 12:25. Lincoln just used a familiar scripture to drive home a point.traffic school hibachi
Yes, Abraham Lincoln.
Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, "Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand.Who said a house divided will not stand?
The quote is first attributed to Jesus of Nazareth and later to Abraham Lincoln. I have no idea who the hell abe lonclon is/was.
It was Abraham Lincoln. He was talking about how the United States will not be able to stand together if they each have opposing views; this is one of his more famous quotes.Who said a house divided will not stand?
No. It's from the book of matthew 12:25. Lincoln just used a familiar scripture to drive home a point.
How will Obama or McCain pass their tax proposals with a divided house?
They won't be able to. Now with the bailout there's no way they'd be able to do it even if they want to. For all of you expecting a tax cut? Forget it.
How will Obama or McCain pass their tax proposals with a divided house?
Bipartisan Compromise.
they are both lying...we'll end up with a tax increase since both are big government proponents.How will Obama or McCain pass their tax proposals with a divided house?
They won't. We're divided closely enough down the middle that I'm seeing gridlock of proportions never seen before here in the next couple of years.
***** slapping the opponents into submission. Yes. This.How will Obama or McCain pass their tax proposals with a divided house?
Obama will do fine. McCain is cutting it close. Palin, however, wouldn't have a chance in hell.
THANK YOU!!
If Obama is elected the Congress will be polarized. The Republican's will stall everything.
If McCain wins, the Democrats will have the majorities and none of his initiatives will make it through without major baggage in the form of amendments (if they even get that far).
This election is lose-lose.
It looks like if we want a productive Washington again, we will have to send an Independent to the Whitehouse. Let's see if Mayor Bloomberg will be running in 2012.
How will Obama or McCain pass their tax proposals with a divided house?
Bipartisan Compromise.
they are both lying...we'll end up with a tax increase since both are big government proponents.How will Obama or McCain pass their tax proposals with a divided house?
They won't. We're divided closely enough down the middle that I'm seeing gridlock of proportions never seen before here in the next couple of years.
***** slapping the opponents into submission. Yes. This.How will Obama or McCain pass their tax proposals with a divided house?
Obama will do fine. McCain is cutting it close. Palin, however, wouldn't have a chance in hell.
THANK YOU!!
If Obama is elected the Congress will be polarized. The Republican's will stall everything.
If McCain wins, the Democrats will have the majorities and none of his initiatives will make it through without major baggage in the form of amendments (if they even get that far).
This election is lose-lose.
It looks like if we want a productive Washington again, we will have to send an Independent to the Whitehouse. Let's see if Mayor Bloomberg will be running in 2012.
House Divided Car tag for Nebraska and Georgia? Any sites?
Im looking for a website that would sell/create,etc a "House Divided Car Tag" for University of Georgia %26amp; University of Nebraska. Any suggestions?House Divided Car tag for Nebraska and Georgia? Any sites?
Usually those types of tags are only for rivalries, and conference foes. You might have to get it custom made.House Divided Car tag for Nebraska and Georgia? Any sites?
That's a pretty divided house! I would look up a sight that makes custom plates.House Divided Car tag for Nebraska and Georgia? Any sites?
um.. have we ever played nebraska (besides the 1969 sun bowl?)
have to find someone to make it want find one made sense they hardly ever play each other. might want to check at one of those huts in most malls that make the plates they might can help you out
Usually those types of tags are only for rivalries, and conference foes. You might have to get it custom made.House Divided Car tag for Nebraska and Georgia? Any sites?
That's a pretty divided house! I would look up a sight that makes custom plates.House Divided Car tag for Nebraska and Georgia? Any sites?
um.. have we ever played nebraska (besides the 1969 sun bowl?)
have to find someone to make it want find one made sense they hardly ever play each other. might want to check at one of those huts in most malls that make the plates they might can help you out
How does Lincoln's Cooper Union Address compare with the House Divided speech?
Same ideas expressed in different words.
Where can I find a Pittsburgh Steelers and Oakland Raiders house divided flag?
you better make your own. Raiders and Steelers fans have a hate goin on since the 70's
Remembering what Lincoln said about a house divided against itself not being able stand how long do you think?
this country will last?Remembering what Lincoln said about a house divided against itself not being able stand how long do you think?
good question.
It depends on what " Lines " the split comes: 1) financial 2) racial or 3) religiousRemembering what Lincoln said about a house divided against itself not being able stand how long do you think?
Centuries, at least.
We've been through FAR worse than this, folks. This is child's play.
Read the history of the politics of this nation.
You'll be surprised how civil, comparatively, you have all been.
It goes in cycles, folks.
Not that our enemies want us to know that.
Socialists want class warfare.
Islam wants us turning on ourselves.
Both are utterly perplexed when their best efforts fail.
We have a great system, folks. Keep it up, keep speaking up.Remembering what Lincoln said about a house divided against itself not being able stand how long do you think?
This government in its current form is being filled with corruption. If the American people want to change the corruption they may want the US to become a socialist nation.palladium ballroom mass effect video
good question.
It depends on what " Lines " the split comes: 1) financial 2) racial or 3) religiousRemembering what Lincoln said about a house divided against itself not being able stand how long do you think?
Centuries, at least.
We've been through FAR worse than this, folks. This is child's play.
Read the history of the politics of this nation.
You'll be surprised how civil, comparatively, you have all been.
It goes in cycles, folks.
Not that our enemies want us to know that.
Socialists want class warfare.
Islam wants us turning on ourselves.
Both are utterly perplexed when their best efforts fail.
We have a great system, folks. Keep it up, keep speaking up.Remembering what Lincoln said about a house divided against itself not being able stand how long do you think?
This government in its current form is being filled with corruption. If the American people want to change the corruption they may want the US to become a socialist nation.
How are household duties divided in your house?
Like if you are stay at home parent - during the day vs when your spouse/SO is home.
Same for working out of the house parents - what do you do vs your spouse.
- to add a disclaimer here - im curious how other households divide up labor. this isnt a who is right or wrong or who does more or any thing else you could fight about. im genuinely curious to see if there is a "norm."
i hope that makes sense.|||I do most of it, unless dear husband gets a wild hair up his bum and decides to do the laundry or the dishes.
I'm not a SAHM, I'm a full-time working mom.|||I'm in charge of laundry, cooking some nights, cleaning the kitchen when I don't cook, dusting, mopping, general tidying etc.
My husband does all the repairs and stereotypical "men" stuff. We divide the cooking and cleaning of the kitchen (he is a MUCH better cook than me), he takes out the garbage, the boys help him feed the pets, he tidies up any messes I didn't get to, helps iron, etc.
My kids all have chores. For the youngest ones is just stuff like cleaning their rooms, and helping out everyone else. My eldest is in charge of cleaning the bathrooms, and the dishwasher.
Childcare is divided evenly most of the time. Because i'm not working ATM and he is, I deal with everything during the day, and he takes over more when he gets home, or after dinner.
Household chores and parenting is something we rarely argue about. After 17 years of marriage we've realized keeping it equal is important, and helps to keep everyone happy. If my husband didn't help out so much I would have gone insane by now!!!|||My husband works long days at his place of business and is on call from home in the evening. My brother is in a skilled trade which can make short days or extremely long days. Because of this it really cuts back on what they are able to contribute as far as household chores. I run my own home business which is very flexible as to when I need to work. So I can do all the chores and do work when I find time throughout the day without it being an issue.
My husband helps watch the kids in the evening as well as rotates taking the garbage to the curb once a week with my brother. He is also in charge of taking out the kitchen scraps. My son (3yrs) is in charge of taking out the garbage for me. He loves to clean and help so that's his task. As for me I do everything else that's left over from taking care of the garden, watching the kids, keeping the garage organized, cleaning the house, household repairs, and doing the laundry. =)|||There is no concrete division of duties around here, such as I do all of the cooking, he does all of the yardwork, etc. We just help each other out as needed. If I need help or want his help because I'm feeling overwhelmed and overworked, I simply ask politely for his help.
Since he works 50+ hours a week and I'm home 24-7, it's safe to say that I do take on the brunt of the housework and childcare. When he is home, he's happy to help where he's needed, but I understand his need for downtime also. He's willing to fix meals, change diapers, sweep and mop floors, vacuum, do laundry, do yardwork, take out the trash, put kids to bed, give them their baths, help them with brushing teeth, etc., but I need to ask or he just doesn't realize the help is needed.
A list works best for him, if I need him to do certain things when he's home. Then I give him the list, he gets it done on his own time and in his own way. That eliminates any sort of conflict over household duties because he knows exactly what I need him to do and I know that he'll get it done.|||We're both really good at looking around and seeing what needs to be done. And I think that's part of why we never fight. We don't divide many chores, except there's a couple things he hates doing, and a couple things that I hate doing. So we're considerate of that. I'll do all laundry as long as he washes the floors. We both do dinner, the lawn, tubs for the kids, vaccumming, monitoring homework, and most other household jobs. We have the same goal and that is to sit down at the end of the day and say "ahhhh!"|||I work during the school year and stay at home during the summer.
During the summer, I basically am the main housekeeper. My husband may set the table, or do a little picking up, etc., but I do most of it. During the school year, I'd say he does more housekeeping than I do. We share child rearing duties, but my youngest is 6 now, so there's no more diapering or bathing.
Oh, I help more with homework and I teach my children during the summer.|||I work 0730-1630 M-F in an admin position for the military, I also attend school from 1845-2130 T and Th. During the week I take out the garbage from time to time, I walk the dog, I do small clean up throughout the house and the dishes from time to time. My husband does the same thing throughout the week. He stays home with my daughter and does almost all laundry (but I fold it when I get home.) He vacuums on Wed and I vacuum and mop on Sat. Do I think the balance is really fair? NO, but he doesn't clean to my standards. When I'm done cleaning the floor you could eat off it, when he's done there's still dust in the corners. I've accepted this (and told him he needs to get a job or he's going to make me crazy.)|||Hah. Hah. Hah.
We both WoH full-time and DD goes to school.
I do the cooking, laundry, cleaning [not a lot of that -- housekeeper of the year I am not], chauferring DD to her activities, dishes, most pet care, etc.
DD sets the table for dinner, changes the catbox, puts groceries away, and helps with the dishes and cooking.
Hubby --- mows the lawn and puts the trash out once a week. And does occassional repair/maintainance as needed. (And yes, we fight about it -- mostly him complaining that I dont' keep the house clean enough.)
(DD is a teenager so there isn't much 'child care' anymore. When she was a baby and I was a SaH mom, he actually did a lot of childcare while he was home in the evenings/weekends. I breastfed so he couldn't feed her, but he helped with diapers, baths, played with her, etc.|||When my husband was working, I was a stay at home mom and I did everything except on the week ends, then he took care of our son and I took care of the house/cooking. I had no issue with this because that was my "job".
Now that my hubby has been laid off, he does everything!! LOL It is more because I am pregnant and SO tired, but it is nice that he caters to my every need. He is so good with our son. The only thing I really do any more is cook! He cleans the house and does most of everything for our little boy.|||I have just worked about 18 hours in the past two days...my SO has cleaned the entire apartment and taken care of the kids in those two days...there is some laundry that still needs to be done but that is an every day occurance in this household...
When we are both working then he will feed and take care of the animals in the morning, and also the children most of the time, he will also put laundry into the washer and dryer downstairs when he's working out and then bring it back up....we come home and sweep the floors, do dishes and take care of folding laundry before going to bed or settling down for the night.|||Family of 4. Children are 8 years and 15 month old.
I work part time and Hubby works full time. Since I get to be home more it only make sense that I have more duties.
I am the only cook in the house. I mainly care for our 15 month old since she is very attached to me right now. My Hubby mainly cares for our 8 year old since it is easier for him to handle because our little one doesn't want to be around her daddy much. She gets fussy with others but not so much with me. I mainly cook and clean the house. Hubby does the laundry while I put the clothes away when it's all nice and clean. He does the ironing since I suck at it. :D He takes the trash out everyday.
Some days our duties are even some days it isn't. Mainly I have more duties because I just do it better than he does and he knows it too.|||We have a 5 year old and an 11 week old. I have always worked until I just had this last baby and I will be staying home for 4 months.
We have pretty much kept our duties the same as when I was home and working.
Me: cook meals, get kids ready in the morning, clean house, change diapers, laundry,
hubby: dishes, weekend meals, hang up clothes, bathtime for both kids, trash,|||I'm a stay at home mum with three children and my husband works 12 hour shifts, alternate days and nights each week. For those reasons, I do all the housework, garden, childcare, small DIY jobs, shopping, pets, extra activites with the kids etc.
He feeds and walks the dogs if he is around when it is time to do it, and he will also bring the boys to their sports practises if he is at home. Other than that, he is allergic to the vacuum cleaner (in 18 years, he has used it once, and on that occasion he broke it!) and doesn't get the concept of tidying as you go. Oh well....sigh!|||My husband and I both work full time: well I am off in the summer. My husband travels a lot with his work, so in most cases I do most of the housework. My three daughters are still young, but they each have some chores they are expected to do, and it helps things go more smoothly. My husband is great, and when he is home he does all the yard work and does help with the washing of clothes. I always do the cleaning, becasue I am a neat freak lol. If he does it I always go back and redo it, I just can't help it :). I cook while he is not home, but when he is home it is something he enjoys doing, so he does it. Washing the dishes is one of the chores my daughters have. We have a good system|||I cook, he washes dishes. I wipe down countertops and mop, he sweeps. I dust, he vacuums. I do most of the laundry, he helps. He mows the lawn, I do the edging/ gardening. I give baths, read stories, he wrestles and helps get them to sleep. I have to be at work ealier than he does and before daycare opens so I get things ready for him in the evening and he does it all in the morning.
These aren't set in stone or written rules, just things I've noticed. We work well together for the most part.|||what i can get done during the day is my job. when we're both home, it's 50-50. since he has skills that i don't (that man can fix anything and i have to think to myself "righty-tighty") there's some natural division of labor. but otherwise when we're both here, we're both doing childcare and other tasks that need doing.
and i've always been astonished by marriages where it works differently.|||I am not a cook - but my husband loves it so he does all of the meals that require cooking - dinner/supper %26amp; large breakfasts. We both take turns buying groceries. I do all the laundry. He cleans the bathrooms. I help the children with school work %26amp; see to their social needs. He teaches them hunting %26amp; fishing %26amp; tenting (survival skills!!). We both work full time %26amp; have two dogs that we share responsibilities for. Works for us!|||I stay home with the kids while my husband works. I take care of the kids , feed them, bath them, cook, clean, and do all the other household duties. He only works 4 days a week, so when he's home its his turn for most of the stuff we do.|||Bella- Picks up her toys and cleans up her messes
Mommy- Everything else|||I do it now just like I did it when we were both working. We have different standards so if I want it done I do it.|||I do it all, but that's okay....|||I am not happy about it at all, but I do 95% of the work around the house and taking care of the kids. Hubby does a load of laundry like every 6 months and thinks he should get a freakin award. I cannot remember the last time he loaded the dishwasher--I am not sure he knows what button to push to turn it on. His idea of cooking is to have me pick the restaurant and he pays ( with my debit card-joint account). He does work 40 hours a week and is involved in boy scouts, and is starting a new business ( that he has been working on for a year. last year we had a 5k loss on our taxes), however I:
*do all the vaccuming, laundry, cooking ,shopping, bill paying
* manage HIS prescriptions including monitoring when HE is running low
* manage the 4 prescritions for our autistic 13 year old
* manage all the educational stuff ( placement, IEP, re-entry meetings, etc) for the same child.
* manage doctor/therapy appointments, including attending said appointments. Hubby never met the first psychiatrist, met the second one 2x, and has not met the 3rd one yet. He has met the behavior specialist 2x---and one of them was at our house.
* manage and attend speech therapy for our 3 year old. he has been in therapy for 16 months and hubby has never met the therapist.
* make sure the kids actually get a bath more than once a week ( but it is tuesday, didn't they just have a bath? sure....on SUNDAY)
All I ask of hubby is that he
*clean the turtle tank reasonably often ( more often than every 6 months)
* take the trash out when it is full
* do the maintenance on the vehicles ( fluid levels, oil changes, tire pressure/replacement, etc)
* occasionally watch the kids so I can have time with my friends....dinner and a drink or two .|||Naturally since I am the stay at home parent I DO take on more of the responsibilities (and gladly so). My husband works hard all day long to provide for the family. The least I can do to show my gratitude is to take care of what he, by God's grace, has provided for me.
I take care of the kids while he provides for the family, but he does give me my breaks. Just this last Saturday he watched the kids while I went to meet my mom for breakfast and some shopping.
But he does pitch in a lot. He trades nights of dish duty with me, he does some laundry, he takes out the trash and he does the "hard chores": bathing the dog, mowing the lawn, weed eating, cleaning the showers (yes he does the showers, lol. the fumes from the cleaning stuff is just too much for me!).
We share the duties in caring for the house, but I do take on more of them most of the time.
My kids on the other hand have simple tasks. My 3 year old is required to pick up after himself, clean his room, take his plate to the sink and put away his shoes (he chose that one). My 1 year old doesn't do much yet, but she has started to pitch in when it's time to clean up toys for the evening. She copies her big brother, it's so sweet :)
Same for working out of the house parents - what do you do vs your spouse.
- to add a disclaimer here - im curious how other households divide up labor. this isnt a who is right or wrong or who does more or any thing else you could fight about. im genuinely curious to see if there is a "norm."
i hope that makes sense.|||I do most of it, unless dear husband gets a wild hair up his bum and decides to do the laundry or the dishes.
I'm not a SAHM, I'm a full-time working mom.|||I'm in charge of laundry, cooking some nights, cleaning the kitchen when I don't cook, dusting, mopping, general tidying etc.
My husband does all the repairs and stereotypical "men" stuff. We divide the cooking and cleaning of the kitchen (he is a MUCH better cook than me), he takes out the garbage, the boys help him feed the pets, he tidies up any messes I didn't get to, helps iron, etc.
My kids all have chores. For the youngest ones is just stuff like cleaning their rooms, and helping out everyone else. My eldest is in charge of cleaning the bathrooms, and the dishwasher.
Childcare is divided evenly most of the time. Because i'm not working ATM and he is, I deal with everything during the day, and he takes over more when he gets home, or after dinner.
Household chores and parenting is something we rarely argue about. After 17 years of marriage we've realized keeping it equal is important, and helps to keep everyone happy. If my husband didn't help out so much I would have gone insane by now!!!|||My husband works long days at his place of business and is on call from home in the evening. My brother is in a skilled trade which can make short days or extremely long days. Because of this it really cuts back on what they are able to contribute as far as household chores. I run my own home business which is very flexible as to when I need to work. So I can do all the chores and do work when I find time throughout the day without it being an issue.
My husband helps watch the kids in the evening as well as rotates taking the garbage to the curb once a week with my brother. He is also in charge of taking out the kitchen scraps. My son (3yrs) is in charge of taking out the garbage for me. He loves to clean and help so that's his task. As for me I do everything else that's left over from taking care of the garden, watching the kids, keeping the garage organized, cleaning the house, household repairs, and doing the laundry. =)|||There is no concrete division of duties around here, such as I do all of the cooking, he does all of the yardwork, etc. We just help each other out as needed. If I need help or want his help because I'm feeling overwhelmed and overworked, I simply ask politely for his help.
Since he works 50+ hours a week and I'm home 24-7, it's safe to say that I do take on the brunt of the housework and childcare. When he is home, he's happy to help where he's needed, but I understand his need for downtime also. He's willing to fix meals, change diapers, sweep and mop floors, vacuum, do laundry, do yardwork, take out the trash, put kids to bed, give them their baths, help them with brushing teeth, etc., but I need to ask or he just doesn't realize the help is needed.
A list works best for him, if I need him to do certain things when he's home. Then I give him the list, he gets it done on his own time and in his own way. That eliminates any sort of conflict over household duties because he knows exactly what I need him to do and I know that he'll get it done.|||We're both really good at looking around and seeing what needs to be done. And I think that's part of why we never fight. We don't divide many chores, except there's a couple things he hates doing, and a couple things that I hate doing. So we're considerate of that. I'll do all laundry as long as he washes the floors. We both do dinner, the lawn, tubs for the kids, vaccumming, monitoring homework, and most other household jobs. We have the same goal and that is to sit down at the end of the day and say "ahhhh!"|||I work during the school year and stay at home during the summer.
During the summer, I basically am the main housekeeper. My husband may set the table, or do a little picking up, etc., but I do most of it. During the school year, I'd say he does more housekeeping than I do. We share child rearing duties, but my youngest is 6 now, so there's no more diapering or bathing.
Oh, I help more with homework and I teach my children during the summer.|||I work 0730-1630 M-F in an admin position for the military, I also attend school from 1845-2130 T and Th. During the week I take out the garbage from time to time, I walk the dog, I do small clean up throughout the house and the dishes from time to time. My husband does the same thing throughout the week. He stays home with my daughter and does almost all laundry (but I fold it when I get home.) He vacuums on Wed and I vacuum and mop on Sat. Do I think the balance is really fair? NO, but he doesn't clean to my standards. When I'm done cleaning the floor you could eat off it, when he's done there's still dust in the corners. I've accepted this (and told him he needs to get a job or he's going to make me crazy.)|||Hah. Hah. Hah.
We both WoH full-time and DD goes to school.
I do the cooking, laundry, cleaning [not a lot of that -- housekeeper of the year I am not], chauferring DD to her activities, dishes, most pet care, etc.
DD sets the table for dinner, changes the catbox, puts groceries away, and helps with the dishes and cooking.
Hubby --- mows the lawn and puts the trash out once a week. And does occassional repair/maintainance as needed. (And yes, we fight about it -- mostly him complaining that I dont' keep the house clean enough.)
(DD is a teenager so there isn't much 'child care' anymore. When she was a baby and I was a SaH mom, he actually did a lot of childcare while he was home in the evenings/weekends. I breastfed so he couldn't feed her, but he helped with diapers, baths, played with her, etc.|||When my husband was working, I was a stay at home mom and I did everything except on the week ends, then he took care of our son and I took care of the house/cooking. I had no issue with this because that was my "job".
Now that my hubby has been laid off, he does everything!! LOL It is more because I am pregnant and SO tired, but it is nice that he caters to my every need. He is so good with our son. The only thing I really do any more is cook! He cleans the house and does most of everything for our little boy.|||I have just worked about 18 hours in the past two days...my SO has cleaned the entire apartment and taken care of the kids in those two days...there is some laundry that still needs to be done but that is an every day occurance in this household...
When we are both working then he will feed and take care of the animals in the morning, and also the children most of the time, he will also put laundry into the washer and dryer downstairs when he's working out and then bring it back up....we come home and sweep the floors, do dishes and take care of folding laundry before going to bed or settling down for the night.|||Family of 4. Children are 8 years and 15 month old.
I work part time and Hubby works full time. Since I get to be home more it only make sense that I have more duties.
I am the only cook in the house. I mainly care for our 15 month old since she is very attached to me right now. My Hubby mainly cares for our 8 year old since it is easier for him to handle because our little one doesn't want to be around her daddy much. She gets fussy with others but not so much with me. I mainly cook and clean the house. Hubby does the laundry while I put the clothes away when it's all nice and clean. He does the ironing since I suck at it. :D He takes the trash out everyday.
Some days our duties are even some days it isn't. Mainly I have more duties because I just do it better than he does and he knows it too.|||We have a 5 year old and an 11 week old. I have always worked until I just had this last baby and I will be staying home for 4 months.
We have pretty much kept our duties the same as when I was home and working.
Me: cook meals, get kids ready in the morning, clean house, change diapers, laundry,
hubby: dishes, weekend meals, hang up clothes, bathtime for both kids, trash,|||I'm a stay at home mum with three children and my husband works 12 hour shifts, alternate days and nights each week. For those reasons, I do all the housework, garden, childcare, small DIY jobs, shopping, pets, extra activites with the kids etc.
He feeds and walks the dogs if he is around when it is time to do it, and he will also bring the boys to their sports practises if he is at home. Other than that, he is allergic to the vacuum cleaner (in 18 years, he has used it once, and on that occasion he broke it!) and doesn't get the concept of tidying as you go. Oh well....sigh!|||My husband and I both work full time: well I am off in the summer. My husband travels a lot with his work, so in most cases I do most of the housework. My three daughters are still young, but they each have some chores they are expected to do, and it helps things go more smoothly. My husband is great, and when he is home he does all the yard work and does help with the washing of clothes. I always do the cleaning, becasue I am a neat freak lol. If he does it I always go back and redo it, I just can't help it :). I cook while he is not home, but when he is home it is something he enjoys doing, so he does it. Washing the dishes is one of the chores my daughters have. We have a good system|||I cook, he washes dishes. I wipe down countertops and mop, he sweeps. I dust, he vacuums. I do most of the laundry, he helps. He mows the lawn, I do the edging/ gardening. I give baths, read stories, he wrestles and helps get them to sleep. I have to be at work ealier than he does and before daycare opens so I get things ready for him in the evening and he does it all in the morning.
These aren't set in stone or written rules, just things I've noticed. We work well together for the most part.|||what i can get done during the day is my job. when we're both home, it's 50-50. since he has skills that i don't (that man can fix anything and i have to think to myself "righty-tighty") there's some natural division of labor. but otherwise when we're both here, we're both doing childcare and other tasks that need doing.
and i've always been astonished by marriages where it works differently.|||I am not a cook - but my husband loves it so he does all of the meals that require cooking - dinner/supper %26amp; large breakfasts. We both take turns buying groceries. I do all the laundry. He cleans the bathrooms. I help the children with school work %26amp; see to their social needs. He teaches them hunting %26amp; fishing %26amp; tenting (survival skills!!). We both work full time %26amp; have two dogs that we share responsibilities for. Works for us!|||I stay home with the kids while my husband works. I take care of the kids , feed them, bath them, cook, clean, and do all the other household duties. He only works 4 days a week, so when he's home its his turn for most of the stuff we do.|||Bella- Picks up her toys and cleans up her messes
Mommy- Everything else|||I do it now just like I did it when we were both working. We have different standards so if I want it done I do it.|||I do it all, but that's okay....|||I am not happy about it at all, but I do 95% of the work around the house and taking care of the kids. Hubby does a load of laundry like every 6 months and thinks he should get a freakin award. I cannot remember the last time he loaded the dishwasher--I am not sure he knows what button to push to turn it on. His idea of cooking is to have me pick the restaurant and he pays ( with my debit card-joint account). He does work 40 hours a week and is involved in boy scouts, and is starting a new business ( that he has been working on for a year. last year we had a 5k loss on our taxes), however I:
*do all the vaccuming, laundry, cooking ,shopping, bill paying
* manage HIS prescriptions including monitoring when HE is running low
* manage the 4 prescritions for our autistic 13 year old
* manage all the educational stuff ( placement, IEP, re-entry meetings, etc) for the same child.
* manage doctor/therapy appointments, including attending said appointments. Hubby never met the first psychiatrist, met the second one 2x, and has not met the 3rd one yet. He has met the behavior specialist 2x---and one of them was at our house.
* manage and attend speech therapy for our 3 year old. he has been in therapy for 16 months and hubby has never met the therapist.
* make sure the kids actually get a bath more than once a week ( but it is tuesday, didn't they just have a bath? sure....on SUNDAY)
All I ask of hubby is that he
*clean the turtle tank reasonably often ( more often than every 6 months)
* take the trash out when it is full
* do the maintenance on the vehicles ( fluid levels, oil changes, tire pressure/replacement, etc)
* occasionally watch the kids so I can have time with my friends....dinner and a drink or two .|||Naturally since I am the stay at home parent I DO take on more of the responsibilities (and gladly so). My husband works hard all day long to provide for the family. The least I can do to show my gratitude is to take care of what he, by God's grace, has provided for me.
I take care of the kids while he provides for the family, but he does give me my breaks. Just this last Saturday he watched the kids while I went to meet my mom for breakfast and some shopping.
But he does pitch in a lot. He trades nights of dish duty with me, he does some laundry, he takes out the trash and he does the "hard chores": bathing the dog, mowing the lawn, weed eating, cleaning the showers (yes he does the showers, lol. the fumes from the cleaning stuff is just too much for me!).
We share the duties in caring for the house, but I do take on more of them most of the time.
My kids on the other hand have simple tasks. My 3 year old is required to pick up after himself, clean his room, take his plate to the sink and put away his shoes (he chose that one). My 1 year old doesn't do much yet, but she has started to pitch in when it's time to clean up toys for the evening. She copies her big brother, it's so sweet :)
Jesus said; A house divided cannot stand. If true,how would LDS respond to many exorcisms performed by RCC?
They accused Jesus of casting out devils by the power of satan. Bruce Mc Konkie said the Roman Catholic Church is the church of the devil. Yet, there is a rich history of successful exorcisms in the Catholic faith. If what Jesus said was true, how can Mc Conkie be right?Jesus said; A house divided cannot stand. If true,how would LDS respond to many exorcisms performed by RCC?
Oh that's easy. Obviously the "exorcisms" performed by all other denominations are all scams and frauds and probably with the help of the demons themselves, while the exorcisms performed by the one denomination you belong to are with the true power of Jesus and God and the Holy Spirit. Totally.
there is hypocrisy if you have the same perspective as the answer that was selected.
Are you familiar with the story of Simon in the New Testament?
Acts 8:9
Also,sincere faith isn't only found in members of the LDS church. I don't think it is safe to generalize one answer for all of these events.
Then the house of Christianity cannot stand much longer, there are few more divided organizations in the world.Jesus said; A house divided cannot stand. If true,how would LDS respond to many exorcisms performed by RCC?
i am Methodist...it is good that the demons are cast out...
no one in the leadership of the RCC has The Authority of God to cast out demons.......
ALL of those of The True Church have God's Authority to command demons to depart.... but some are stronger than others... that is not something to be taken lightly......even those of The True Church(all those of The True Christian Faith) may be harmed by demons
mormons are NOT of The True Church.... no mormons, or any of the leadership of the RCC, will be found in Heaven
Oh that's easy. Obviously the "exorcisms" performed by all other denominations are all scams and frauds and probably with the help of the demons themselves, while the exorcisms performed by the one denomination you belong to are with the true power of Jesus and God and the Holy Spirit. Totally.
there is hypocrisy if you have the same perspective as the answer that was selected.
Report Abuse
Jesus said; A house divided cannot stand. If true,how would LDS respond to many exorcisms performed by RCC?Are you familiar with the story of Simon in the New Testament?
Acts 8:9
Also,sincere faith isn't only found in members of the LDS church. I don't think it is safe to generalize one answer for all of these events.
Then the house of Christianity cannot stand much longer, there are few more divided organizations in the world.Jesus said; A house divided cannot stand. If true,how would LDS respond to many exorcisms performed by RCC?
i am Methodist...it is good that the demons are cast out...
no one in the leadership of the RCC has The Authority of God to cast out demons.......
ALL of those of The True Church have God's Authority to command demons to depart.... but some are stronger than others... that is not something to be taken lightly......even those of The True Church(all those of The True Christian Faith) may be harmed by demons
mormons are NOT of The True Church.... no mormons, or any of the leadership of the RCC, will be found in Heaven
Is the house GOP a House divided against itself and will it fall in 2012?
I don't see why the Republicans are kissing the T-Parties asp. This short term vote wooing will surely be a long term detriment to them. I'd show more respect to the GOP if they stood up against them and severed any connections. They are just like adolescents that want everything their way 100% even if they don't understand the consequences. The economy is largely driven by perception and confidence. Show a little faith that we can recover and work towards it. Not run and hide and sacrifice your futures like a bunch of chickens. I still believe in Obama's plans, get health care costs under control, educate our brightest and apply the knowledge to tomorrows technology. The concept of public health care is much like the Unions approach. They have to deal with you if you stand as one. SS is fine, not a problem, especially after us baby boomers are gone. Medicare is the only civilized approach. Trim it but keep it. It's a privilege but it's a duty that we look after our elderly. And the argument that you can afford your own medical coverage and don't feel you need to contribute to the system is a selfish one. Just count your blessings that you are so well off.
So I guess what I am saying is if you don't want to contribute to schools or medicare you can always move.Is the house GOP a House divided against itself and will it fall in 2012?
If the House Republicans continue to infight between the mainstream and the Tea Party they will do little but implode and give the people a great deal to gripe about. Independents are not thrilled with the Tea Party and the more the mainstream Republicans give in to them the more Independents they will lose to Obama. Will the House go back to being Democratic? Very possibly, if this keeps up. Americans don't like extremists - whether they are on the right or left.
There is a struggle. It seems that would be normal, considering the tea party is pressing the fiscal Conservative issue back into the GOP. remember, the liberals have whined and whined about the big spending of the GOP past. Well, here is your chance to see that change.
What is truly amazing is this:
The communist party supports Obama, the unions and the democratic party.
http://www.cpusa.org/12-days-to-go-the-e鈥?/a>
http://www.cpusa.org/for-the-sake-of-the鈥?/a>
Unions, communists, socialist, progressives and liberals.... The democrat tank boils them all together somehow. This is mind boggling how the democratic party can pull this off. Drone syndrome is about all I can think of.Is the house GOP a House divided against itself and will it fall in 2012?
HAHAAHAHAHAHAA! Boy would the Progs love that, but there is something so rank we have to deal with we will come together against it ... as well as all the half asses who play it for what they can get like the assholes playing shell games like democrats, hell with them. We don't need them. We need the constitution
Keep dreaming lefty. We're running you out of the Senate in 2012, and hopefully the presidency too, so the real Americans can take our country back from the socialists.Is the house GOP a House divided against itself and will it fall in 2012?
If it doesn't the nation will fall into a murderously bloody civil war.
Snap out of it. Party line vote today for the Ryan budget. Where's this "divided House?"
The house is divided all right - but it's not GOP.
no we will raise like the sun
we taking over the GOVT and shutting it down!!!!!
goodbye EPA FDA FBI and TSA
It just might. Its loonies and greed that is running that party right now.
me think it depends on the numbers
no, they all will go down with the ship
So I guess what I am saying is if you don't want to contribute to schools or medicare you can always move.Is the house GOP a House divided against itself and will it fall in 2012?
If the House Republicans continue to infight between the mainstream and the Tea Party they will do little but implode and give the people a great deal to gripe about. Independents are not thrilled with the Tea Party and the more the mainstream Republicans give in to them the more Independents they will lose to Obama. Will the House go back to being Democratic? Very possibly, if this keeps up. Americans don't like extremists - whether they are on the right or left.
There is a struggle. It seems that would be normal, considering the tea party is pressing the fiscal Conservative issue back into the GOP. remember, the liberals have whined and whined about the big spending of the GOP past. Well, here is your chance to see that change.
What is truly amazing is this:
The communist party supports Obama, the unions and the democratic party.
http://www.cpusa.org/12-days-to-go-the-e鈥?/a>
http://www.cpusa.org/for-the-sake-of-the鈥?/a>
Unions, communists, socialist, progressives and liberals.... The democrat tank boils them all together somehow. This is mind boggling how the democratic party can pull this off. Drone syndrome is about all I can think of.Is the house GOP a House divided against itself and will it fall in 2012?
HAHAAHAHAHAHAA! Boy would the Progs love that, but there is something so rank we have to deal with we will come together against it ... as well as all the half asses who play it for what they can get like the assholes playing shell games like democrats, hell with them. We don't need them. We need the constitution
Keep dreaming lefty. We're running you out of the Senate in 2012, and hopefully the presidency too, so the real Americans can take our country back from the socialists.Is the house GOP a House divided against itself and will it fall in 2012?
If it doesn't the nation will fall into a murderously bloody civil war.
Snap out of it. Party line vote today for the Ryan budget. Where's this "divided House?"
The house is divided all right - but it's not GOP.
no we will raise like the sun
we taking over the GOVT and shutting it down!!!!!
goodbye EPA FDA FBI and TSA
It just might. Its loonies and greed that is running that party right now.
me think it depends on the numbers
no, they all will go down with the ship
IS Mr. Obama unable to understand the basic principle: "A house divided against itself cannot stand."?
The Chinese have a saying about leadership: "A fish rots from the head."
Do you believe if Mr. Obama cared about us, he would care about the serious and vitriolic division her "encourages"? Doesn't he know that goes in the face of the above Founder's declaration? And if he does understand this, why does he continue to divide us while calling himself leader?
What is your opinion of the 2 quotes above, please?IS Mr. Obama unable to understand the basic principle: "A house divided against itself cannot stand."?
You miss a very basic thing about Mr. Obama. He's well aware of whats good...of what would work for the country. That is NOT what he or his supporters want.To destroy the fabric of society....to make GOVERNMENT the central force in all things. THAT is what he wants.
I believe BO is using the standard liberal tactic of divide and conquer - a corollary of the first quote. What I can't decide is the reasons for it. There are really only two possibilities; he knows what he is doing or he doesn't. If he doesn't know then he is a clueless moron. While I don't care for the man, I don't believe he's a moron.
If we assume he knows what he is doing that either makes him an evil tyrannical dictator wanna be or a radical narcissistic ideologue. While it would be easy to claim the first option, I'm actually leaning towards the second. I believe he is trying to break this country down so that he can raise it up into whatever his vision of the perfect society is and be viewed as its savior. And based on his stated goals, that seems to be a socialist society.
So at the present time, he has no intention of "unifying" people into one group. Or, if not one group, at least not multiple groups at each others throats. It simply wouldn't serve his purpose.IS Mr. Obama unable to understand the basic principle: "A house divided against itself cannot stand."?
Polly - I think Obama genuinely wanted to united us, not divided us -- although who knows. I'm not a mindreader and can't tell what the President is thinking by ESP.
Now a question for you: Do you honestly think that if the GOP clobbers the Democrats this election and destroys Obama's presidency -- which you seem to be about to do -- do you honestly think that the USA won't be a "house divided" after that?
When tens of millions of Democratic voters, however good or bad we are, however smart or stupid you consider us, see the GOP taking power this November after a nasty campaign in which you guys accused Obama of being everything from a Muslim terrorist to a Marxist -- Do you REALLY think that America is going to be a "house united," under Republican leadership?
You offer some fun quotes in your question. But your question reminds me of a quote from the Old Testament:
"An eye for an eye,
a tooth for a tooth,
a son for a son."
And I would add - "a president for a president."
If America is a "house divided" under Obama and the Democrats, it's going to continue being a "house divided" under YOUR rightwing regime, too.
It's not only "elephants" who never forget. The rest of us have political memories also.
Lincoln used those words in his famous House Divided speech. Nearly half the nation rose up in rebellion when he was elected because of obstinacy in their desire to cling to slavery. President Obama understands the principle very well. He has to do what is right and just for the country. He can't try to avoid controversy by caving to the other side when they are clearly wrong. People today are still dividing the country with their obstinacy. Meanness and bigotry can't prevail.IS Mr. Obama unable to understand the basic principle: "A house divided against itself cannot stand."?
The problem is not Obama.
The problem is a vitriolic right wing that has determined that the only way is their way. When Republicans quit acting like sore losers, we can be united.
During the inauguration Obama said he was willing to extend the hand of peace if you are willing to unclench your fist.
Maybe you need to look in the mirror.
It is the Republicans that threaten to shut down government if they don't get their way. It was also Republicans that encouraged talk about seceding from the Union, and hoping that Obama fails.
The right wing is a cancer on our country.
Not only does Obama understand he is causing it on propose in my opinion from Obamacare
Democrat Senator John Dingell Says Obamacare Soon Will "Control the People" and
Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" to Rev Wright it is all anti-American and pro communism. The good point is he was try to divide which he has and conquer which he has not--Yet!
If "We the People" stand against big government then we win other wise get use to saying comrade.
"A house divided against itself cannot stand" was said by Lincoln, not (as you claim) a "Founder." Is there a reason that someone as smart and perfect as you got this wrong?
You do realize that Lincoln wanted the house united HIS WAY. By your logic, Lincoln should have given the South it's way and kept slavery just to be a uniting leader.
Why do you assume President Obama is doing the dividing? The Party of "No" name for the Republicans is recent. If anything Obama is guilty of assuming that his good ideas would be accepted by a majority of the House and Senate. There is too much politics in the politicians.
His head was rotted as a young child.
He was divided from his Dad and now wants to divide everything and anything.
This act of calling names and his divisive accolades makes him look very bad esp. as a President.
All too well. That's why he is a messiah to liberals. He stands in defense of everything that is wrong with our country.
Jay - Jesus said that in the bible long before Lincoln said it. It goes to show that Lincoln had a good inspiration.
It takes 2 to tango. The founders set up a government designed for compromise, no is not a compromise.
1. Obama knows what he's doing.
#2. Obama wants to destroy the United States of America
So, are you saying we should tell our senators to stand behind the presidents leadership and help forward his ideas??
THe president doesn't follow congress.
it's not like the teabaggers understand that principle.
both sides need to work harder in regards to meeting in the middle
Divide and Conquer.
The secret agenda is no longer secret.
Do you believe if Mr. Obama cared about us, he would care about the serious and vitriolic division her "encourages"? Doesn't he know that goes in the face of the above Founder's declaration? And if he does understand this, why does he continue to divide us while calling himself leader?
What is your opinion of the 2 quotes above, please?IS Mr. Obama unable to understand the basic principle: "A house divided against itself cannot stand."?
You miss a very basic thing about Mr. Obama. He's well aware of whats good...of what would work for the country. That is NOT what he or his supporters want.To destroy the fabric of society....to make GOVERNMENT the central force in all things. THAT is what he wants.
I believe BO is using the standard liberal tactic of divide and conquer - a corollary of the first quote. What I can't decide is the reasons for it. There are really only two possibilities; he knows what he is doing or he doesn't. If he doesn't know then he is a clueless moron. While I don't care for the man, I don't believe he's a moron.
If we assume he knows what he is doing that either makes him an evil tyrannical dictator wanna be or a radical narcissistic ideologue. While it would be easy to claim the first option, I'm actually leaning towards the second. I believe he is trying to break this country down so that he can raise it up into whatever his vision of the perfect society is and be viewed as its savior. And based on his stated goals, that seems to be a socialist society.
So at the present time, he has no intention of "unifying" people into one group. Or, if not one group, at least not multiple groups at each others throats. It simply wouldn't serve his purpose.IS Mr. Obama unable to understand the basic principle: "A house divided against itself cannot stand."?
Polly - I think Obama genuinely wanted to united us, not divided us -- although who knows. I'm not a mindreader and can't tell what the President is thinking by ESP.
Now a question for you: Do you honestly think that if the GOP clobbers the Democrats this election and destroys Obama's presidency -- which you seem to be about to do -- do you honestly think that the USA won't be a "house divided" after that?
When tens of millions of Democratic voters, however good or bad we are, however smart or stupid you consider us, see the GOP taking power this November after a nasty campaign in which you guys accused Obama of being everything from a Muslim terrorist to a Marxist -- Do you REALLY think that America is going to be a "house united," under Republican leadership?
You offer some fun quotes in your question. But your question reminds me of a quote from the Old Testament:
"An eye for an eye,
a tooth for a tooth,
a son for a son."
And I would add - "a president for a president."
If America is a "house divided" under Obama and the Democrats, it's going to continue being a "house divided" under YOUR rightwing regime, too.
It's not only "elephants" who never forget. The rest of us have political memories also.
Lincoln used those words in his famous House Divided speech. Nearly half the nation rose up in rebellion when he was elected because of obstinacy in their desire to cling to slavery. President Obama understands the principle very well. He has to do what is right and just for the country. He can't try to avoid controversy by caving to the other side when they are clearly wrong. People today are still dividing the country with their obstinacy. Meanness and bigotry can't prevail.IS Mr. Obama unable to understand the basic principle: "A house divided against itself cannot stand."?
The problem is not Obama.
The problem is a vitriolic right wing that has determined that the only way is their way. When Republicans quit acting like sore losers, we can be united.
During the inauguration Obama said he was willing to extend the hand of peace if you are willing to unclench your fist.
Maybe you need to look in the mirror.
It is the Republicans that threaten to shut down government if they don't get their way. It was also Republicans that encouraged talk about seceding from the Union, and hoping that Obama fails.
The right wing is a cancer on our country.
Not only does Obama understand he is causing it on propose in my opinion from Obamacare
Democrat Senator John Dingell Says Obamacare Soon Will "Control the People" and
Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" to Rev Wright it is all anti-American and pro communism. The good point is he was try to divide which he has and conquer which he has not--Yet!
If "We the People" stand against big government then we win other wise get use to saying comrade.
"A house divided against itself cannot stand" was said by Lincoln, not (as you claim) a "Founder." Is there a reason that someone as smart and perfect as you got this wrong?
You do realize that Lincoln wanted the house united HIS WAY. By your logic, Lincoln should have given the South it's way and kept slavery just to be a uniting leader.
Why do you assume President Obama is doing the dividing? The Party of "No" name for the Republicans is recent. If anything Obama is guilty of assuming that his good ideas would be accepted by a majority of the House and Senate. There is too much politics in the politicians.
His head was rotted as a young child.
He was divided from his Dad and now wants to divide everything and anything.
This act of calling names and his divisive accolades makes him look very bad esp. as a President.
All too well. That's why he is a messiah to liberals. He stands in defense of everything that is wrong with our country.
Jay - Jesus said that in the bible long before Lincoln said it. It goes to show that Lincoln had a good inspiration.
It takes 2 to tango. The founders set up a government designed for compromise, no is not a compromise.
1. Obama knows what he's doing.
#2. Obama wants to destroy the United States of America
So, are you saying we should tell our senators to stand behind the presidents leadership and help forward his ideas??
THe president doesn't follow congress.
it's not like the teabaggers understand that principle.
both sides need to work harder in regards to meeting in the middle
Divide and Conquer.
The secret agenda is no longer secret.
Can you run for senator in two states if your house is divided by two borders?
Im watching this show and its talking about people who live in georgia and the tennesee border runs straight through there house. So technically they are living in two states. Does that mean they can run for senator in either of those two states?Can you run for senator in two states if your house is divided by two borders?
It depends which state they claim residence in.syndicate bank english to hebrew translation
It depends which state they claim residence in.
Where can i watch movie a house divided?
about a white guy and a slave had a daughter, anyway it was the time of slavery.Where can i watch movie a house divided?
you can watch it here online
http://url.ie/5e35
hope you will enjoyWhere can i watch movie a house divided?
you can try this on the
http://www.youtube.com/ for your movie
you can watch it here online
http://url.ie/5e35
hope you will enjoyWhere can i watch movie a house divided?
you can try this on the
http://www.youtube.com/ for your movie
What was the song in the House episode "House Divided?"?
The song at Chase's bachelor party, the one that's really upbeat, with a pop-y sound and is sung by a girl.What was the song in the House episode "House Divided?"?
It was called 'American Cowboy" by Jada
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcfQ8C7mT鈥?/a>
It was called 'American Cowboy" by Jada
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcfQ8C7mT鈥?/a>
How did douglas find about the house divided speech?
since he wasn't there, how did he hear about it? are there any documents describing his initial reaction?How did douglas find about the house divided speech?
Would that be Stephan A. Douglas or Frederick Douglass? Both men were quite intelligent and could read so I would imagine they read about the speech in a newspaper.
Would that be Stephan A. Douglas or Frederick Douglass? Both men were quite intelligent and could read so I would imagine they read about the speech in a newspaper.
I have written a book titled, "A House Divided: A Retelling of the First Book of Samuel"?
I would like to get some comments/feedback, constructive criticism. Can anyone recommend where would be a good place on the internet to post it?
Thanks,
RachelI have written a book titled, "A House Divided: A Retelling of the First Book of Samuel"?
Are you trying to get published? Are you concerned that someone might steal your book if you post it? It sounds interesting.
You could try iUniverse.com Some sites have writing contests too.
Thanks,
RachelI have written a book titled, "A House Divided: A Retelling of the First Book of Samuel"?
Are you trying to get published? Are you concerned that someone might steal your book if you post it? It sounds interesting.
You could try iUniverse.com Some sites have writing contests too.
How can I find out if a certain street address is an apartment complex or if it a house, divided into apts?
You can try google maps, then zoom in or use street view if available. http://maps.google.comHow can I find out if a certain street address is an apartment complex or if it a house, divided into apts?
other than going there yourself, you can call that city assestment dept. (anyone can access public records), just ask them.How can I find out if a certain street address is an apartment complex or if it a house, divided into apts?
by a GPScollege books the amnesia
other than going there yourself, you can call that city assestment dept. (anyone can access public records), just ask them.How can I find out if a certain street address is an apartment complex or if it a house, divided into apts?
by a GPS
Is a House divided.....as worthless as 3 coins in the fountain? What good are wishes?
Why did Abraham Lincoln say " things are looking very promising indeed" about the country that he saw unfolding?
Is it true that....... if a man chases after two hares he will catch neither?
How can so many religions all be pleasing to God, when he requires unity in thought and actions?Is a House divided.....as worthless as 3 coins in the fountain? What good are wishes?
their is only one religion that is pleasing to god as their is one truth, but you must understand that god is a god of mercy. if he were to flat out level anyone who has ever been wrong about something, there would be no one left, and nor would it be just because people learn their habits from their parents, but it is up to the children to "see" the good and evil that is in their parents and decide which is the right way to go for themselves.
children of wealthy parents will usually do one of two things, they will either reject their parents wealth and go their own way under consequence of those parents potentially not supporting them, loving parents will continue to support their children as they should view themselves as responsible for their upbringing, whereas parents that reject their children god will assist.(this is a generality, there are always lots of in betweens)
other children of wealthy parents will (either unknowingly or otherwise) see that they have an advantage of believing what their parents believe (and may even believe that their parents are right, though surely many are motivated by ulterior motives) and those parents will bless that child financially, giving that person a "hand up" in life.
god calls out the righteous from among all nations, and a righteous muslim (saladin? i think was a muslim during the time of the crusades who was a seemingly honorable man http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saladin ) and honors those who follow the spirit of christ. when christ spoke of acknowledging his name, he said "if you love me you will do what i say"
this means that there is such a thing as natural wisdom, which is to say, observance of human behavior and seeing the consequences of actions, and choosing the path of wisdom which is to understand how and when to act. this is why some muslims can be very convinced that christianity is wrong, because they have wisdom but the only thing they fail to realize is that it comes from christ (and since god understands that they are raised muslim, he does not judge them for it)
wisdom is justified by all her children
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?鈥?/a>Is a House divided.....as worthless as 3 coins in the fountain? What good are wishes?
President Eisenhower said "Things are more like they are today then they ever where before". President Nixon later quoted him.
All those quotes are not about religion or about G-d. Any religion is pleasing to Him. He does not care how you believe in him, as long as you believe. The organized religions are the correct religions for the people who need them. The believers who just believe and never go to church are just as correct as anyone else. G-d gave us free will and do not require anything in return. What I believe is correct for me, what you believe is correct for you. Nothing I can say can change your mind about faith or religion and nothing you can say can change my believes either. I accept your choices unequivocally and without reservation. I hope you can do the same.Is a House divided.....as worthless as 3 coins in the fountain? What good are wishes?
Wow, Bilbo! 4 questions in one today.
If you are going to war, a house divided is weak, In business a house divided
can invest in many activities like General Electric and grow very big.
I don't know when Lincoln said that, but he certainly was a man of vision.
With modern technology, a man desiring to catch hares would probably set
traps and catch both or more. Sometimes man does solve age old problems
and advances civilization.
I think God is pleased when ever man turns to the Holy Spirit for help in learning
his lessons here on earth. All religions are a work in progress and are inspired by
Holy Spirit to get us headed back to God"s reality. Usually referred to as
"Awakening" . It will dawn on each of us because it is God's Will.
Is it true that....... if a man chases after two hares he will catch neither?
How can so many religions all be pleasing to God, when he requires unity in thought and actions?Is a House divided.....as worthless as 3 coins in the fountain? What good are wishes?
their is only one religion that is pleasing to god as their is one truth, but you must understand that god is a god of mercy. if he were to flat out level anyone who has ever been wrong about something, there would be no one left, and nor would it be just because people learn their habits from their parents, but it is up to the children to "see" the good and evil that is in their parents and decide which is the right way to go for themselves.
children of wealthy parents will usually do one of two things, they will either reject their parents wealth and go their own way under consequence of those parents potentially not supporting them, loving parents will continue to support their children as they should view themselves as responsible for their upbringing, whereas parents that reject their children god will assist.(this is a generality, there are always lots of in betweens)
other children of wealthy parents will (either unknowingly or otherwise) see that they have an advantage of believing what their parents believe (and may even believe that their parents are right, though surely many are motivated by ulterior motives) and those parents will bless that child financially, giving that person a "hand up" in life.
god calls out the righteous from among all nations, and a righteous muslim (saladin? i think was a muslim during the time of the crusades who was a seemingly honorable man http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saladin ) and honors those who follow the spirit of christ. when christ spoke of acknowledging his name, he said "if you love me you will do what i say"
this means that there is such a thing as natural wisdom, which is to say, observance of human behavior and seeing the consequences of actions, and choosing the path of wisdom which is to understand how and when to act. this is why some muslims can be very convinced that christianity is wrong, because they have wisdom but the only thing they fail to realize is that it comes from christ (and since god understands that they are raised muslim, he does not judge them for it)
wisdom is justified by all her children
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?鈥?/a>Is a House divided.....as worthless as 3 coins in the fountain? What good are wishes?
President Eisenhower said "Things are more like they are today then they ever where before". President Nixon later quoted him.
All those quotes are not about religion or about G-d. Any religion is pleasing to Him. He does not care how you believe in him, as long as you believe. The organized religions are the correct religions for the people who need them. The believers who just believe and never go to church are just as correct as anyone else. G-d gave us free will and do not require anything in return. What I believe is correct for me, what you believe is correct for you. Nothing I can say can change your mind about faith or religion and nothing you can say can change my believes either. I accept your choices unequivocally and without reservation. I hope you can do the same.Is a House divided.....as worthless as 3 coins in the fountain? What good are wishes?
Wow, Bilbo! 4 questions in one today.
If you are going to war, a house divided is weak, In business a house divided
can invest in many activities like General Electric and grow very big.
I don't know when Lincoln said that, but he certainly was a man of vision.
With modern technology, a man desiring to catch hares would probably set
traps and catch both or more. Sometimes man does solve age old problems
and advances civilization.
I think God is pleased when ever man turns to the Holy Spirit for help in learning
his lessons here on earth. All religions are a work in progress and are inspired by
Holy Spirit to get us headed back to God"s reality. Usually referred to as
"Awakening" . It will dawn on each of us because it is God's Will.
What does Abraham Lincoln mean when he said "a house divided"?
he said it in his speech containing this quote, "A house divided against itself cannot stand". I am just wondering what he is referring to when he says house. Does he mean the government or the country? I want definite answers, not just guesses. try to list the source if you can so i can verify your answerWhat does Abraham Lincoln mean when he said "a house divided"?
In 1854 Lincoln campaigned for the election to Congress of Richard Yates, an antislavery Whig, on a platform of opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Act. However, Lincoln was after bigger game. His target was none other than Douglas himself, whose nickname was "The Little Giant."
In October 1854, Douglas came to Springfield to defend the Kansas-Nebraska Act. After Douglas spoke, Lincoln mounted the speaker's platform and announced that he would answer Douglas's speech the next night. For days, Lincoln had haunted the state library, read congressional documents, and organized his arguments against slavery. The next night, in his shirtsleeves and without a collar or tie, Lincoln spoke. Attacking the Kansas-Nebraska Act itself, he said: "The Missouri Compromise forbade slavery to go north of 36掳30'. Our government breaks down that restriction and opens the door for slavery to enter where it could not go. This is practically legislating for slavery, recognizing it, extending it."
Douglas had spoken of slavery only as a political issue. The morality of the institution did not concern him. To Lincoln, however, slavery was both a political and a moral issue. "It is said," Lincoln continued, "that the slaveholder has the same political right to take his Negroes to Kansas that a freeman has to take his hogs or his horses. This would be true if Negroes were property in the same sense that hogs and horses are. But is this the case? It is notoriously not so."
To Lincoln, slavery was incompatible with American democracy. "When the white man governs himself," he said, "that is self-government; but when he governs himself, and also governs another man-that is despotism. If the ***** is a man, why then my ancient faith teaches me that 'all men are created equal,' and that there can be no moral right in connection with one man's making a slave of another."
Lincoln avoided abolitionist doctrine, taking the view that slavery was a national problem, not merely a Southern one. "I think," he went on, "I would not hold one in slavery, at any rate, yet the point is not clear enough for me to denounce people upon .鈥t does seem to me that some system of gradual emancipation might be adopted, but for their tardiness in this, I will not undertake to judge our brethren of the South." Lincoln repeated this speech in Peoria, Illinois, 12 days later. It has become known as his Peoria speech.
Despite his new role as a spokesman for the antislavery forces in Illinois, Lincoln declined to join the Republican Party, then being formed on an abolition platform. The Whig Party was in rapid decline, but Lincoln remained with it until its death. In 1855 he was the Whig candidate for the U.S. Senate, the upper chamber of Congress. U.S. senators were then elected by the state legislatures. Lincoln led for seven ballots. Then, seeing that he could not win, he threw his support to an anti-Douglas Democrat, Lyman Trumbull, who was elected.
He meant a nation divided, giving the metaphor of a house as a family. If a family is divided the isn't a family.What does Abraham Lincoln mean when he said "a house divided"?
Country
He was refering to the country. In other words if the country was divided into the north and south it could never exist as a country. As many did in those days he believed that the north and south must remain united and the north and south could never be allowed to divide into two countries. In fact that was the reason for the civil war. If the north had not wanted to remain united they would have told the south to go on their way. I mean the north had most of the wealth and inventions. All the south had to offer was cotton production was useless without the northern textile mills anyway. The confederate states would have been a poor country without trading with the north. The northerners were so determined to keep the southern states in the union that they were willing to fight to make it so.....and the civil war began.What does Abraham Lincoln mean when he said "a house divided"?
Basic answer -
Well, in the context, I'm not quite sure what the difference might be. Lincoln spoke of both "government" and "Union" (his word for the country/nation). We find this in the very next sentence after his "house divided" quote. Note the capitalized words:
"I believe this GOVERNMENT cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the UNION to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other."
http://www.nationalcenter.org/HouseDivid鈥?/a>
I suppose if forced to choose, I would say "government", since the issue IS what the legal status of slavery will be.. how the laws will treat it, etc. Perhaps that's what you have in mind.
______________________
To fill this out -- the rest of the paragraph clarifies the question of 'divided/united in what way?' as follows:
"Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new, North as well as South"
If you read through the rest of the speech in context it becomes apparent what Lincoln is arguing. This speech, given June 16, 1858 while accepting the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate from Illinois, was the first salvo in his challenge to the approach to the slavery issue by Stephen Douglas (and the Democratic Party), the beginning of an argument pursued in the famous Lincoln-Douglas debates.
The following paragraphs go on to rehearse the actions of the Democrats on this issue (esp of slavery in the TERRITORIES), which he sees as tending in the "latter" direction - of making slavery lawful in ALL states, focusing esp on the Kansas-Nebraska Act [of 1854] and the Dred Scott decision [of 1857]. (He acknowledges a struggle between Douglas and President Buchanan --over the legitimacy of the pro-slavery Lecompton Constitution for Kansas, but argues it doesn't amount to any real difference in principle.)
For more analysis of this speech and its importance, as well as its connection with the Lincoln-Douglas debates, check out these links:
http://www.claremont.org/publications/pu鈥?/a>
http://www.mrlincolnandfreedom.org/insid鈥?/a>
Beau's correct!
He was alluding to a biblical quote, in reference to the US being divided, north VS south, in the pre-Civil War days.
He is using it as a metaphor to describe the state of the nation at the time, in that a country that is divided will only fall apart.
In 1854 Lincoln campaigned for the election to Congress of Richard Yates, an antislavery Whig, on a platform of opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Act. However, Lincoln was after bigger game. His target was none other than Douglas himself, whose nickname was "The Little Giant."
In October 1854, Douglas came to Springfield to defend the Kansas-Nebraska Act. After Douglas spoke, Lincoln mounted the speaker's platform and announced that he would answer Douglas's speech the next night. For days, Lincoln had haunted the state library, read congressional documents, and organized his arguments against slavery. The next night, in his shirtsleeves and without a collar or tie, Lincoln spoke. Attacking the Kansas-Nebraska Act itself, he said: "The Missouri Compromise forbade slavery to go north of 36掳30'. Our government breaks down that restriction and opens the door for slavery to enter where it could not go. This is practically legislating for slavery, recognizing it, extending it."
Douglas had spoken of slavery only as a political issue. The morality of the institution did not concern him. To Lincoln, however, slavery was both a political and a moral issue. "It is said," Lincoln continued, "that the slaveholder has the same political right to take his Negroes to Kansas that a freeman has to take his hogs or his horses. This would be true if Negroes were property in the same sense that hogs and horses are. But is this the case? It is notoriously not so."
To Lincoln, slavery was incompatible with American democracy. "When the white man governs himself," he said, "that is self-government; but when he governs himself, and also governs another man-that is despotism. If the ***** is a man, why then my ancient faith teaches me that 'all men are created equal,' and that there can be no moral right in connection with one man's making a slave of another."
Lincoln avoided abolitionist doctrine, taking the view that slavery was a national problem, not merely a Southern one. "I think," he went on, "I would not hold one in slavery, at any rate, yet the point is not clear enough for me to denounce people upon .鈥t does seem to me that some system of gradual emancipation might be adopted, but for their tardiness in this, I will not undertake to judge our brethren of the South." Lincoln repeated this speech in Peoria, Illinois, 12 days later. It has become known as his Peoria speech.
Despite his new role as a spokesman for the antislavery forces in Illinois, Lincoln declined to join the Republican Party, then being formed on an abolition platform. The Whig Party was in rapid decline, but Lincoln remained with it until its death. In 1855 he was the Whig candidate for the U.S. Senate, the upper chamber of Congress. U.S. senators were then elected by the state legislatures. Lincoln led for seven ballots. Then, seeing that he could not win, he threw his support to an anti-Douglas Democrat, Lyman Trumbull, who was elected.
He meant a nation divided, giving the metaphor of a house as a family. If a family is divided the isn't a family.What does Abraham Lincoln mean when he said "a house divided"?
Country
He was refering to the country. In other words if the country was divided into the north and south it could never exist as a country. As many did in those days he believed that the north and south must remain united and the north and south could never be allowed to divide into two countries. In fact that was the reason for the civil war. If the north had not wanted to remain united they would have told the south to go on their way. I mean the north had most of the wealth and inventions. All the south had to offer was cotton production was useless without the northern textile mills anyway. The confederate states would have been a poor country without trading with the north. The northerners were so determined to keep the southern states in the union that they were willing to fight to make it so.....and the civil war began.What does Abraham Lincoln mean when he said "a house divided"?
Basic answer -
Well, in the context, I'm not quite sure what the difference might be. Lincoln spoke of both "government" and "Union" (his word for the country/nation). We find this in the very next sentence after his "house divided" quote. Note the capitalized words:
"I believe this GOVERNMENT cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the UNION to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other."
http://www.nationalcenter.org/HouseDivid鈥?/a>
I suppose if forced to choose, I would say "government", since the issue IS what the legal status of slavery will be.. how the laws will treat it, etc. Perhaps that's what you have in mind.
______________________
To fill this out -- the rest of the paragraph clarifies the question of 'divided/united in what way?' as follows:
"Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new, North as well as South"
If you read through the rest of the speech in context it becomes apparent what Lincoln is arguing. This speech, given June 16, 1858 while accepting the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate from Illinois, was the first salvo in his challenge to the approach to the slavery issue by Stephen Douglas (and the Democratic Party), the beginning of an argument pursued in the famous Lincoln-Douglas debates.
The following paragraphs go on to rehearse the actions of the Democrats on this issue (esp of slavery in the TERRITORIES), which he sees as tending in the "latter" direction - of making slavery lawful in ALL states, focusing esp on the Kansas-Nebraska Act [of 1854] and the Dred Scott decision [of 1857]. (He acknowledges a struggle between Douglas and President Buchanan --over the legitimacy of the pro-slavery Lecompton Constitution for Kansas, but argues it doesn't amount to any real difference in principle.)
For more analysis of this speech and its importance, as well as its connection with the Lincoln-Douglas debates, check out these links:
http://www.claremont.org/publications/pu鈥?/a>
http://www.mrlincolnandfreedom.org/insid鈥?/a>
Beau's correct!
He was alluding to a biblical quote, in reference to the US being divided, north VS south, in the pre-Civil War days.
He is using it as a metaphor to describe the state of the nation at the time, in that a country that is divided will only fall apart.
Is there anywhere I could purchase a 'house divided' shirt or flag for 'Patriots vs. Cowboys'?
I have been surfing the net all day and can't seem to find any sites where it may be sold. . . I need a specific site, please.Is there anywhere I could purchase a 'house divided' shirt or flag for 'Patriots vs. Cowboys'?
http://www.google.com/products
http://www.google.com/products
Where can I find a Dallas Cowboys/Chicago Bears 'House Divided' mat or blanket?
My fiance is a Cowboys fan and I was raised a Bears fan ... where can I find a mat or blanket displaying these teams as a house divided?Where can I find a Dallas Cowboys/Chicago Bears 'House Divided' mat or blanket?
NFLShop.com, either of the teams website, Amazon, EBay. Craig's List or have an independent company make it up for you.....Where can I find a Dallas Cowboys/Chicago Bears 'House Divided' mat or blanket?
have you tried tailgaters ally, amazon, ebay, or search that in googleWhere can I find a Dallas Cowboys/Chicago Bears 'House Divided' mat or blanket?
Bears fan and Cowboys fan? My condolences to both of you....from a Packers fan.
NFLShop.com, either of the teams website, Amazon, EBay. Craig's List or have an independent company make it up for you.....Where can I find a Dallas Cowboys/Chicago Bears 'House Divided' mat or blanket?
have you tried tailgaters ally, amazon, ebay, or search that in googleWhere can I find a Dallas Cowboys/Chicago Bears 'House Divided' mat or blanket?
Bears fan and Cowboys fan? My condolences to both of you....from a Packers fan.
What were the different factions in the audiance at Lincoln's House Divided speach in 1858?
I know that his audiance were Republicans but what were the different factions of republicans? What did they believe and value? What were thier openions on this speech?What were the different factions in the audiance at Lincoln's House Divided speach in 1858?
I believe it was those how opposed slavery and those he would allow slavery to remain were it already exists but not spread. That was the point, we can鈥檛 two sets of guiding values for the nation, either all men (people) are equal or they are not. Lincoln gave this speech in excepting the Republican nomination for the Senate, he lost so, the seat but, won the popular vote so, it must have been well received by regular people and not popular with the political establishment.human revolution deus ex spongebob games online
I believe it was those how opposed slavery and those he would allow slavery to remain were it already exists but not spread. That was the point, we can鈥檛 two sets of guiding values for the nation, either all men (people) are equal or they are not. Lincoln gave this speech in excepting the Republican nomination for the Senate, he lost so, the seat but, won the popular vote so, it must have been well received by regular people and not popular with the political establishment.
A house divided cannot stand, is Parry Bellasalma further marginalizing the National Organization for Women?
The president of the National Organization for Women may have said it's wrong for anyone to call a woman a "whore," but the head of the California NOW affiliate says Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman is one.
California NOW President Parry Bellasalma told the TPM blog on Thursday that the description of the Republican candidate for governor of California is accurate.A house divided cannot stand, is Parry Bellasalma further marginalizing the National Organization for Women?
I've also heard feminists ready to excuse and even defend and laugh at horribly degrading things said about the likes of Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin.
Now, I don't see such a big problem here since I am not censorious at all. But feminists who want to claim the moral high ground and demand their sensibilities be respected have a real problem if they want to demand respect for all women EXCEPT those whose politics they oppose.A house divided cannot stand, is Parry Bellasalma further marginalizing the National Organization for Women?
listen we just want the best candidate for women's issues to win and that ain't any Republican so lets get real for a change here people!
California NOW President Parry Bellasalma told the TPM blog on Thursday that the description of the Republican candidate for governor of California is accurate.A house divided cannot stand, is Parry Bellasalma further marginalizing the National Organization for Women?
I've also heard feminists ready to excuse and even defend and laugh at horribly degrading things said about the likes of Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin.
Now, I don't see such a big problem here since I am not censorious at all. But feminists who want to claim the moral high ground and demand their sensibilities be respected have a real problem if they want to demand respect for all women EXCEPT those whose politics they oppose.A house divided cannot stand, is Parry Bellasalma further marginalizing the National Organization for Women?
listen we just want the best candidate for women's issues to win and that ain't any Republican so lets get real for a change here people!
Why a house divided cannot stand, what if they are all sitting in division?
Such as a cell, obviously that stand well as it separates.Why a house divided cannot stand, what if they are all sitting in division?
A house stands best with multiple equal pillars.
A house stands best with multiple equal pillars.
What effect did the House Divided Speech by Abe have ?
what effect did the House Divided Speech by Abe have ?What effect did the House Divided Speech by Abe have ?
Along with the Gettysburg Address and his second inaugural address, this became one of the best-known speeches of Abe's career.
Given by Abe on June 17, 1858, in Springfield, Illinois.
He gave it upon accepting the Illinois Republican Party's nomination as that state's United States senator (at the close of the Republican State Convention).
Lincoln caught the mood of many in the North who were increasingly concerned about the morality of slavery on the one hand, and the need to preserve the Union on the other.
The speech created a lasting image of the danger of disunion because of slavery, and it rallied Republicans across the North.
http://usinfo.org/enus/government/overvi鈥?/a>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Divid鈥?/a>
Along with the Gettysburg Address and his second inaugural address, this became one of the best-known speeches of Abe's career.
Given by Abe on June 17, 1858, in Springfield, Illinois.
He gave it upon accepting the Illinois Republican Party's nomination as that state's United States senator (at the close of the Republican State Convention).
Lincoln caught the mood of many in the North who were increasingly concerned about the morality of slavery on the one hand, and the need to preserve the Union on the other.
The speech created a lasting image of the danger of disunion because of slavery, and it rallied Republicans across the North.
http://usinfo.org/enus/government/overvi鈥?/a>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Divid鈥?/a>
Why did JC call 5 books of Moses "five in one house divided"?
Luke 12:52
For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided,
three against two, and two against three.Why did JC call 5 books of Moses "five in one house divided"?
That's not what Jesus was talking about in context. Like, it's not even remotely close to what He was talking about. he was talking about how belief in Him would cause division, as in some people in a household would believe while others would not causing strife between them.
Seriously, read what comes before and what comes after the quote you supplied, you'll see what I am talking about.Why did JC call 5 books of Moses "five in one house divided"?
Is this about the Pentateuch?
Is it not that Jesus is telling his followers that his influence will be so great that people will be divided in their opinions about him, just as you see people here disagreeing about the significance of christianity
For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided,
three against two, and two against three.Why did JC call 5 books of Moses "five in one house divided"?
That's not what Jesus was talking about in context. Like, it's not even remotely close to what He was talking about. he was talking about how belief in Him would cause division, as in some people in a household would believe while others would not causing strife between them.
Seriously, read what comes before and what comes after the quote you supplied, you'll see what I am talking about.Why did JC call 5 books of Moses "five in one house divided"?
Is this about the Pentateuch?
Is it not that Jesus is telling his followers that his influence will be so great that people will be divided in their opinions about him, just as you see people here disagreeing about the significance of christianity
How are chores and responsibilities in the house divided among family members in a typical Thai home?
Sources would be appreciated, thanks!How are chores and responsibilities in the house divided among family members in a typical Thai home?
Like "R" said, it depends on if the family is wealthy, middle class or poor.
In wealthy families the fathers often work, the mother stays at home and the kids goes to an expensive international school, leaving the household work to their personal maid/s, janitor/s and chef.
In a middle class family both mother and father work hard to afford their kids to go to school. The kids then have divided chores like sweeping the floor ETC. Like any other asian family the grandparent/s often live with the family. So the old people often cook the food.
In a poor family the whole family work from early morning to late night. The kids goes to school, but unfortunately only until they are about 9 years as they want to or have to help their parents with the economy. So they don't spend much time at home cleaning or cooking since they have to make money.How are chores and responsibilities in the house divided among family members in a typical Thai home?
depends on wealth. if the family's rich, they always have maids. average or lower, then everyone in the family helps whatever need be done.chicago restaurant week italian translation to english
Like "R" said, it depends on if the family is wealthy, middle class or poor.
In wealthy families the fathers often work, the mother stays at home and the kids goes to an expensive international school, leaving the household work to their personal maid/s, janitor/s and chef.
In a middle class family both mother and father work hard to afford their kids to go to school. The kids then have divided chores like sweeping the floor ETC. Like any other asian family the grandparent/s often live with the family. So the old people often cook the food.
In a poor family the whole family work from early morning to late night. The kids goes to school, but unfortunately only until they are about 9 years as they want to or have to help their parents with the economy. So they don't spend much time at home cleaning or cooking since they have to make money.How are chores and responsibilities in the house divided among family members in a typical Thai home?
depends on wealth. if the family's rich, they always have maids. average or lower, then everyone in the family helps whatever need be done.
A house divided can not stand. Are Christians divided over doctrines?
Some follow the Sermon on the Mount about how we have to change... and others teach that good works get you nowhere. And others focus on the universal light (more on my bio.)
Are Christians forever divided over doctrines? And can a house divided remain standing very long.A house divided can not stand. Are Christians divided over doctrines?
Not long. This is why Jesus is going to come. Good works get you nowhere IF you aren't doing them in the name of the Lord. This is why an Atheist who is a 'good' person cannot make it to heaven. This is why a Christian who is a 'bad' person cannot make it to heaven either.
There has been sectarian fighting in Christianity since the very beginning of the cult.A house divided can not stand. Are Christians divided over doctrines?
No. Christians know the truth. It's the ones who call themselves Christians that twist the Word of God that don't.
YesA house divided can not stand. Are Christians divided over doctrines?
Yes, we all know that the people they hate the most, are each other.
For over 2000 years now, it was always split, even on day 1.
Good point they cannot. However, more and more Christians believe that the "true" Church does not reside solely within any denomination.
A Christian will be lead by the Spirit and know the Word.
True Christains are not divided, so call Christians is, My wife %26amp; I both see the bible the same way, we have been married 18 yrs, %26amp; not one time have we argued about scriptures, Why you may ask, Because if we both have the Holy Ghost of which we do, Then that Holy Ghost will teach us the samething.
Good point...Matthew 7:21 (King James Version)
21Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
"Don't divide over doctrine, follow mine."
Is that what you mean? It doesn't strike me as a very useful position, even if it did work for the Catholic Church for several centuries. Of course, they had to execute dissenters.
Nothing new. Even in Christ's time there has been infighting among every religious sect that existed. Most of it stems from people wanting to mold their religion to fit their lifestyle instead of vice versa. It's pretty simple, but we complicate it to justify our actions. We all will likely go to hell for innocently believing what we were raised to believe. Remember, everyone, the Bible was translated by humans into different languages. HUMANS. If there was anything offensive to King James, you can be assured he had it changed.
apparently...that is why they have so many factions
Yes--Catholicism and Protestantism have very different views that cannot be reconciled. The reason for the Reformation was that Protestants--Martin Luther, to be exact--were disgusted with certain practices and beliefs of the Catholic Church. For example, the Catholics believed that the priest was the intermediary between God and the laypeople, and Protestants believed that all people-not just priests--have a direct connection with God.
What do you expect would happen when someone takes one verse, or a misinterpretation and runs with it to create a whole new church. What do you expect to happen when most churches teach incorrectly, while a few teach it correctly? Did you have a point to make?
Are Christians forever divided over doctrines? And can a house divided remain standing very long.A house divided can not stand. Are Christians divided over doctrines?
Not long. This is why Jesus is going to come. Good works get you nowhere IF you aren't doing them in the name of the Lord. This is why an Atheist who is a 'good' person cannot make it to heaven. This is why a Christian who is a 'bad' person cannot make it to heaven either.
There has been sectarian fighting in Christianity since the very beginning of the cult.A house divided can not stand. Are Christians divided over doctrines?
No. Christians know the truth. It's the ones who call themselves Christians that twist the Word of God that don't.
YesA house divided can not stand. Are Christians divided over doctrines?
Yes, we all know that the people they hate the most, are each other.
For over 2000 years now, it was always split, even on day 1.
Good point they cannot. However, more and more Christians believe that the "true" Church does not reside solely within any denomination.
A Christian will be lead by the Spirit and know the Word.
True Christains are not divided, so call Christians is, My wife %26amp; I both see the bible the same way, we have been married 18 yrs, %26amp; not one time have we argued about scriptures, Why you may ask, Because if we both have the Holy Ghost of which we do, Then that Holy Ghost will teach us the samething.
Good point...Matthew 7:21 (King James Version)
21Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
"Don't divide over doctrine, follow mine."
Is that what you mean? It doesn't strike me as a very useful position, even if it did work for the Catholic Church for several centuries. Of course, they had to execute dissenters.
Nothing new. Even in Christ's time there has been infighting among every religious sect that existed. Most of it stems from people wanting to mold their religion to fit their lifestyle instead of vice versa. It's pretty simple, but we complicate it to justify our actions. We all will likely go to hell for innocently believing what we were raised to believe. Remember, everyone, the Bible was translated by humans into different languages. HUMANS. If there was anything offensive to King James, you can be assured he had it changed.
apparently...that is why they have so many factions
Yes--Catholicism and Protestantism have very different views that cannot be reconciled. The reason for the Reformation was that Protestants--Martin Luther, to be exact--were disgusted with certain practices and beliefs of the Catholic Church. For example, the Catholics believed that the priest was the intermediary between God and the laypeople, and Protestants believed that all people-not just priests--have a direct connection with God.
What do you expect would happen when someone takes one verse, or a misinterpretation and runs with it to create a whole new church. What do you expect to happen when most churches teach incorrectly, while a few teach it correctly? Did you have a point to make?
A house divided against itself cannot stand?
"A house divided against itself cannot stand." -Abe Lincoln Agnostic
The Christian Church is divided into 38,000+ pieces according to the 2001 World Christian Encyclopedia...
If Christianity is the true religion why can't it make up it's mind?A house divided against itself cannot stand?
Thinker,
That is a great question. CHRIST'S CHURCH was "one" in the beginning (Acts 2). Then man got involved and he began to add things and take things from the original plan that was given. For instance, Paul had to speak with one church about the Jewish Converts who wanted to force Gentiles males to be cut in the manner that the Jewish children were (after their birth). These things were not found in the BIBLE and were not taught by the Apostles and were wrong. Those who "add to or take from GOD'S WORD" and make such changes in separating HIS' People will be judged accordingly by CHRIST on the Day of Judgment. I believe that those who are CHRIST'S will read, study, and obey what is written in the Holy Scriptures that were inspired writings. Have a great week!!
Thanks,
Eds
~~~
Muldah- YES!!
~~~
Paul,
Catholicism began about 300 AD.
~~~
.
Of course Abe Lincoln was speaking of the Civil War, not Christianity.
Say you're considering sailing ships: because there are many different kinds of ships, from steel-hulled battleships to sloops to row boats to catamarans, shall we decide that shipbuilders cannot make up their minds?
Let people find the religion that resonates in their hearts.A house divided against itself cannot stand?
God knows His own.
BTW "Honest" Abe plagiarized from Jesus
Mar 3:25 And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.
Luk 11:17 But he, knowing their thoughts, said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and a house [divided] against a house falleth.
Correction ... Protestantism is divided into thousands of unauthorized conflicting manmade denominations. The true Christian Church remains united in belief, united in teaching and united in worship throughout the world after 2,000 years, just as its founder Jesus Christ said it would.A house divided against itself cannot stand?
Jesus said it 1rst %26amp; some put a church b4 Jesus' word. Jesus founded Christianity not the Cc. Jesus directly taught Peter the truth that stands 4ever unchanged (so Peter tho fallible knew the real truth) 2 prepare him 2 head the church on Jesus' behalf starting with Israel while Jesus was alive ("the" Rock is Jesus not Peter {1 Cor 10:4} - Peter imitates Jesus but wasnt Jesus or replacing Jesus like the Cc claims the pope does [%26amp; his so-called infallible claims on the throne] - Neither Peter, Jesus nor His Apostles ever sat on an earthly throne [huge hint] %26amp; the 11 other Apostles [yes, Judas had 2 b replaced so the original 12 Pillars the church foundation is built on would remain intact in accordance with scripture - u can b Apostolic if ur teachings r correct but u never replace original Apostles] were killed off or died WITHIN the 1rst century [Peter wasnt a Roman bishop] - Christianity was illegal @ the time %26amp; the Bible shows corruption was already getting in2 some original churches).
Most original disciples were also killed off, died or forced in2 hiding by Romans/others. So there was no connection btwn Jesus' original followers %26amp; the Cc. In effect, the original church was wiped out %26amp; isolated pockets of true believers were greatly weakened - made it easier 4 those wanting 2 use the Christian label 4 other purposes 2 sow in their corruption (especially since most were illiterate @ that time - The Cc claims they didnt give out Bibles 4 over a 1000 yrs b/c ppl couldnt read so why didnt they teach ppl 2 read?).
Rest-assured neither Jesus or the Apostles authorized Apostolic succession 2 the Cc [the final 12 werent 2 b replaced - God's fixed order of all things Biblical] - the next so-called generation added more corrupt practices that became part of the core beliefs of the Cc about 313-325 AD with Constantine's support + more Pagan practices.
Its impossible 4 a church 2 know Jesus without knowing Jesus' actual Biblical instructions - absent in Cc teachings (the Cc didnt write any part of the NT [not a Cc text - NT was written in the 1rst century by Apostles {NT Gospels/letters preserved the truth 4 all ppl [purpose 4 it being written] not the Cc - God allowed the Cc 2 produce the Bible despite their wrong teachings like He allowed Romans 2 fulfill prophecy without their knowledge [happening again today]}.
God %26amp; Jesus already fully knew (God declared the end from the beginning) what was 2 b written in the NT, that is the truth is complete within its pages (%26amp; the NT proves the OT is true %26amp; the OT reinforces the truth of the NT [the 2 witnesses]). Cc possession wasnt until the 4th century] which contradicts their claims %26amp; God's will, 1 in truth %26amp; Spirit not rituals.
Sadly, the Cc made the same mistake many made, they didnt follow Jesus' Biblical instructions when they set up the Cc. 2 main lies r (which cancels out their other teachings - most of which rnt Biblical anyway [see below] - another false gospel among many %26amp; the real revisionist church history):
1. The CC claims 2 b the 1rst church %26amp; since they r the longest existing church, they r the only "official" church. Jesus' Apostles never named their church "catholic (not in the Bible nor in line with God's message that never changes)" nor did they ever practice Cc religious rituals. There was nearly a 240 yr gap btwn Jesus' original Apostle's church %26amp; the start of the organized Cc - so the Cc was never a part of or the true 1rst Christian Church (neither a label, title, name, its history, # of members, amount of time it existed or claims made about them (like persecution) proves anything - its whats practiced (with respect 2 the real Biblical truth) that makes it either the whole truth or a lie. Calling a dog god doesnt make it God. U can call anything anything - i.e Neither Jesus or Biblical prophets were muslims no matter what Islam claims).
2. Peter was never a pope nor was he or his fellow Apostles ever a member of the Cc (it isnt in the Bible = no apostolic succession) the use of the word pope is a Cc invention - the Bible instructs us not 2 go beyond whats written (I Cor 4:6; Rev 22:18-19). Peter wasnt a bishop of the Cc (he was dead nearly 240 yrs b4 the Cc became a church. Peter wouldnt call himself a pope or b a member of the Cc b/c calling 1self "holy" Father %26amp; other Cc teachings (no priesthood/rituals after Jesus) r abominations. Even the devil knows Jesus is the Son of God so 1 would b wise not 2 trust any church "authority" ahead of whats written in the Bible. Calling urself a Christian or saying u believe in Jesus doesnt make it true (recital of words means nothing).
No matter how much well-meaning ppl (religious or not) read the Bible they cant find Jesus Christ without going directly 2 Jesus thru His Biblical instructions (Jn 5:39; 10:1,7; 3:3,5). God outsmarted man - the Bible is the only 1 that cant b properly understood without Jesus (Jn 14:6; II Cor 3:14, Is 29:11-12 - If Jewish ppl cant pierce the veil over the OT without Jesus then all gentiles cant). Its why theres many interpretations %26amp; many thinking its fairy tales (Jesus came with the sword of division).
The Bible severely warns us not 2 trust humans, not even ourselves, clergy/churches/scholars (Jer 10:2-5,23; Is 2:22; Job 12:11; Prov 14:12; Acts 17:11). So carefully think over what I say. Dont just believe/dismiss what I write. It might save u from making the same mistake many made, getting caught up in religious beliefs having nothing 2 do with knowing God (poisoned tree %26amp; its fruit). I.e. Many claim God is love %26amp; love ur neighbor but they dont know what God's actual definition/application of love is.
Other Cc wrongs:
Mass (not in the Bible) is full of non-biblical rituals, Statues (God isnt in2 dead things - non-living things can't help/save u - praying 2 them is an abomination), the Rosary %26amp; beads, mother Mary (virgin 2 Jesus' birth) as interceder (Jesus is the only way 2 God - not His Apostles/disciples - Jn 14:6; 5:39; 10:1,7; Acts 4:12; IS 1 - Mary was a sinner %26amp; had children after Jesus - Mt 12:46-50), candles, incense, the cross (its more a symbol of the curse rather than Jesus %26amp; 4 the same reasoning against statues), making the sign of the cross, stations of the cross, pope's/other leader's garb they wear, ring, confirmation, the Catholic creed/other Cc documents, raising dead/ppl 2 the status of "saint" (only God %26amp; Jesus have authority 2 do this), priesthood, monks, nuns, purgatory, catechism, devotionals, sacraments, holy eucharist, penance, traditional/repetitive type prayers/chants %26amp; many other things they do rnt in Bible (false teachings cancel out any truth u hv).
Its b/c religion is about man %26amp; what he likes, not what Jesus mandated us 2 do 2 know Him. The result is few will end up saved thru most of them (no1 can save themselves by their own initiative nor will good deeds save u - theres no good in any man - Rom 1:23). 1 must b very careful not 2 get sucked in or going 2 various denominations (especially if u dont know much about whats actually written in the Bible) as u can only add 2 any confusion u hv.
Just b/c religions made many fatal mistakes doesnt mean God doesnt know what He's doing. Many miss this: Jesus is the only 1 in history who said that no1 can find our real God except thru Jesus (Jn 14:6; 5:39; 10:1,7; Acts 4:11). This means "the" truth was complete %26amp; finished thru what Jesus did. So, any so-called new teaching/other religious beliefs r invalid %26amp; cant lead u 2 God. The truth is either the whole truth or its a lie. The truth is the absence of any lie. Either Jesus told the whole truth or He's a false prophet, among many, who should b disregarded. This would also mean that God must not exist either (He either knows what He's doing or He cant b God).
Evidence God knows all: Jesus couldnt hv done nor said what He did unless He fully knew the entire OT (the NT didnt exist @ the time of Jesus - the only way Jesus couldve known the whole OT is if God sent Him). The Apostles couldnt write the NT unless Jesus allowed them 2 know %26amp; remember what He did (Lk 24:25-27,45). Only God could cause it.
A church thats very serious about finding the Biblical truth, understands what being Born Anew is about, might be able 2 help u but no1 can save u except Jesus (Jn 3:1-14 - note: Nicodemus was very religious but Jesus flat out told him he had missed the 1rst most important step, that he must b Born Anew or no matter how religious or good he thought he is he couldn't go 2 Heaven (Jn 3:3,5; Jn 14:6; Acts 4:12). No1 can live without breaking God's Law = sin which separates us from God (why we need 2 b Born Anew the right way).
A teaching can hv a truth but the action taken superficial/false - The Cc like the Pharisees (the same setup) know how 2 clean the outside of the cup but dont understand how the inside is 2 b cleaned thru Jesus' actual message. The fact that the Cc/other religions retain an altar @ the center of their religious practices is 1 sure sign of their being about religious rituals not the truth that stands 4ever unchanged.
voyc4rmwldrns
that's because everyone edits it to suit their own desires. Why follow a book at all if you don't at least use the initial one you supposedly believe in. never made any sense to me.
These are shattered times in this shattered territory.
The Christian Church is divided into 38,000+ pieces according to the 2001 World Christian Encyclopedia...
If Christianity is the true religion why can't it make up it's mind?A house divided against itself cannot stand?
Thinker,
That is a great question. CHRIST'S CHURCH was "one" in the beginning (Acts 2). Then man got involved and he began to add things and take things from the original plan that was given. For instance, Paul had to speak with one church about the Jewish Converts who wanted to force Gentiles males to be cut in the manner that the Jewish children were (after their birth). These things were not found in the BIBLE and were not taught by the Apostles and were wrong. Those who "add to or take from GOD'S WORD" and make such changes in separating HIS' People will be judged accordingly by CHRIST on the Day of Judgment. I believe that those who are CHRIST'S will read, study, and obey what is written in the Holy Scriptures that were inspired writings. Have a great week!!
Thanks,
Eds
~~~
Muldah- YES!!
~~~
Paul,
Catholicism began about 300 AD.
~~~
.
Of course Abe Lincoln was speaking of the Civil War, not Christianity.
Say you're considering sailing ships: because there are many different kinds of ships, from steel-hulled battleships to sloops to row boats to catamarans, shall we decide that shipbuilders cannot make up their minds?
Let people find the religion that resonates in their hearts.A house divided against itself cannot stand?
God knows His own.
BTW "Honest" Abe plagiarized from Jesus
Mar 3:25 And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.
Luk 11:17 But he, knowing their thoughts, said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and a house [divided] against a house falleth.
Correction ... Protestantism is divided into thousands of unauthorized conflicting manmade denominations. The true Christian Church remains united in belief, united in teaching and united in worship throughout the world after 2,000 years, just as its founder Jesus Christ said it would.A house divided against itself cannot stand?
Jesus said it 1rst %26amp; some put a church b4 Jesus' word. Jesus founded Christianity not the Cc. Jesus directly taught Peter the truth that stands 4ever unchanged (so Peter tho fallible knew the real truth) 2 prepare him 2 head the church on Jesus' behalf starting with Israel while Jesus was alive ("the" Rock is Jesus not Peter {1 Cor 10:4} - Peter imitates Jesus but wasnt Jesus or replacing Jesus like the Cc claims the pope does [%26amp; his so-called infallible claims on the throne] - Neither Peter, Jesus nor His Apostles ever sat on an earthly throne [huge hint] %26amp; the 11 other Apostles [yes, Judas had 2 b replaced so the original 12 Pillars the church foundation is built on would remain intact in accordance with scripture - u can b Apostolic if ur teachings r correct but u never replace original Apostles] were killed off or died WITHIN the 1rst century [Peter wasnt a Roman bishop] - Christianity was illegal @ the time %26amp; the Bible shows corruption was already getting in2 some original churches).
Most original disciples were also killed off, died or forced in2 hiding by Romans/others. So there was no connection btwn Jesus' original followers %26amp; the Cc. In effect, the original church was wiped out %26amp; isolated pockets of true believers were greatly weakened - made it easier 4 those wanting 2 use the Christian label 4 other purposes 2 sow in their corruption (especially since most were illiterate @ that time - The Cc claims they didnt give out Bibles 4 over a 1000 yrs b/c ppl couldnt read so why didnt they teach ppl 2 read?).
Rest-assured neither Jesus or the Apostles authorized Apostolic succession 2 the Cc [the final 12 werent 2 b replaced - God's fixed order of all things Biblical] - the next so-called generation added more corrupt practices that became part of the core beliefs of the Cc about 313-325 AD with Constantine's support + more Pagan practices.
Its impossible 4 a church 2 know Jesus without knowing Jesus' actual Biblical instructions - absent in Cc teachings (the Cc didnt write any part of the NT [not a Cc text - NT was written in the 1rst century by Apostles {NT Gospels/letters preserved the truth 4 all ppl [purpose 4 it being written] not the Cc - God allowed the Cc 2 produce the Bible despite their wrong teachings like He allowed Romans 2 fulfill prophecy without their knowledge [happening again today]}.
God %26amp; Jesus already fully knew (God declared the end from the beginning) what was 2 b written in the NT, that is the truth is complete within its pages (%26amp; the NT proves the OT is true %26amp; the OT reinforces the truth of the NT [the 2 witnesses]). Cc possession wasnt until the 4th century] which contradicts their claims %26amp; God's will, 1 in truth %26amp; Spirit not rituals.
Sadly, the Cc made the same mistake many made, they didnt follow Jesus' Biblical instructions when they set up the Cc. 2 main lies r (which cancels out their other teachings - most of which rnt Biblical anyway [see below] - another false gospel among many %26amp; the real revisionist church history):
1. The CC claims 2 b the 1rst church %26amp; since they r the longest existing church, they r the only "official" church. Jesus' Apostles never named their church "catholic (not in the Bible nor in line with God's message that never changes)" nor did they ever practice Cc religious rituals. There was nearly a 240 yr gap btwn Jesus' original Apostle's church %26amp; the start of the organized Cc - so the Cc was never a part of or the true 1rst Christian Church (neither a label, title, name, its history, # of members, amount of time it existed or claims made about them (like persecution) proves anything - its whats practiced (with respect 2 the real Biblical truth) that makes it either the whole truth or a lie. Calling a dog god doesnt make it God. U can call anything anything - i.e Neither Jesus or Biblical prophets were muslims no matter what Islam claims).
2. Peter was never a pope nor was he or his fellow Apostles ever a member of the Cc (it isnt in the Bible = no apostolic succession) the use of the word pope is a Cc invention - the Bible instructs us not 2 go beyond whats written (I Cor 4:6; Rev 22:18-19). Peter wasnt a bishop of the Cc (he was dead nearly 240 yrs b4 the Cc became a church. Peter wouldnt call himself a pope or b a member of the Cc b/c calling 1self "holy" Father %26amp; other Cc teachings (no priesthood/rituals after Jesus) r abominations. Even the devil knows Jesus is the Son of God so 1 would b wise not 2 trust any church "authority" ahead of whats written in the Bible. Calling urself a Christian or saying u believe in Jesus doesnt make it true (recital of words means nothing).
No matter how much well-meaning ppl (religious or not) read the Bible they cant find Jesus Christ without going directly 2 Jesus thru His Biblical instructions (Jn 5:39; 10:1,7; 3:3,5). God outsmarted man - the Bible is the only 1 that cant b properly understood without Jesus (Jn 14:6; II Cor 3:14, Is 29:11-12 - If Jewish ppl cant pierce the veil over the OT without Jesus then all gentiles cant). Its why theres many interpretations %26amp; many thinking its fairy tales (Jesus came with the sword of division).
The Bible severely warns us not 2 trust humans, not even ourselves, clergy/churches/scholars (Jer 10:2-5,23; Is 2:22; Job 12:11; Prov 14:12; Acts 17:11). So carefully think over what I say. Dont just believe/dismiss what I write. It might save u from making the same mistake many made, getting caught up in religious beliefs having nothing 2 do with knowing God (poisoned tree %26amp; its fruit). I.e. Many claim God is love %26amp; love ur neighbor but they dont know what God's actual definition/application of love is.
Other Cc wrongs:
Mass (not in the Bible) is full of non-biblical rituals, Statues (God isnt in2 dead things - non-living things can't help/save u - praying 2 them is an abomination), the Rosary %26amp; beads, mother Mary (virgin 2 Jesus' birth) as interceder (Jesus is the only way 2 God - not His Apostles/disciples - Jn 14:6; 5:39; 10:1,7; Acts 4:12; IS 1 - Mary was a sinner %26amp; had children after Jesus - Mt 12:46-50), candles, incense, the cross (its more a symbol of the curse rather than Jesus %26amp; 4 the same reasoning against statues), making the sign of the cross, stations of the cross, pope's/other leader's garb they wear, ring, confirmation, the Catholic creed/other Cc documents, raising dead/ppl 2 the status of "saint" (only God %26amp; Jesus have authority 2 do this), priesthood, monks, nuns, purgatory, catechism, devotionals, sacraments, holy eucharist, penance, traditional/repetitive type prayers/chants %26amp; many other things they do rnt in Bible (false teachings cancel out any truth u hv).
Its b/c religion is about man %26amp; what he likes, not what Jesus mandated us 2 do 2 know Him. The result is few will end up saved thru most of them (no1 can save themselves by their own initiative nor will good deeds save u - theres no good in any man - Rom 1:23). 1 must b very careful not 2 get sucked in or going 2 various denominations (especially if u dont know much about whats actually written in the Bible) as u can only add 2 any confusion u hv.
Just b/c religions made many fatal mistakes doesnt mean God doesnt know what He's doing. Many miss this: Jesus is the only 1 in history who said that no1 can find our real God except thru Jesus (Jn 14:6; 5:39; 10:1,7; Acts 4:11). This means "the" truth was complete %26amp; finished thru what Jesus did. So, any so-called new teaching/other religious beliefs r invalid %26amp; cant lead u 2 God. The truth is either the whole truth or its a lie. The truth is the absence of any lie. Either Jesus told the whole truth or He's a false prophet, among many, who should b disregarded. This would also mean that God must not exist either (He either knows what He's doing or He cant b God).
Evidence God knows all: Jesus couldnt hv done nor said what He did unless He fully knew the entire OT (the NT didnt exist @ the time of Jesus - the only way Jesus couldve known the whole OT is if God sent Him). The Apostles couldnt write the NT unless Jesus allowed them 2 know %26amp; remember what He did (Lk 24:25-27,45). Only God could cause it.
A church thats very serious about finding the Biblical truth, understands what being Born Anew is about, might be able 2 help u but no1 can save u except Jesus (Jn 3:1-14 - note: Nicodemus was very religious but Jesus flat out told him he had missed the 1rst most important step, that he must b Born Anew or no matter how religious or good he thought he is he couldn't go 2 Heaven (Jn 3:3,5; Jn 14:6; Acts 4:12). No1 can live without breaking God's Law = sin which separates us from God (why we need 2 b Born Anew the right way).
A teaching can hv a truth but the action taken superficial/false - The Cc like the Pharisees (the same setup) know how 2 clean the outside of the cup but dont understand how the inside is 2 b cleaned thru Jesus' actual message. The fact that the Cc/other religions retain an altar @ the center of their religious practices is 1 sure sign of their being about religious rituals not the truth that stands 4ever unchanged.
voyc4rmwldrns
that's because everyone edits it to suit their own desires. Why follow a book at all if you don't at least use the initial one you supposedly believe in. never made any sense to me.
These are shattered times in this shattered territory.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)